Republican lawmakers are breaking ranks with President Donald Trump in a stunning move that has launched dual investigations into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — and potentially the president himself — over an alleged illegal kill order in the Caribbean Sea.
But even as GOP-led committees vow “rigorous oversight,” critics are already asking the same question: Will they actually follow through, or is this just another performance with no accountability?
The investigations were triggered by new Washington Post reporting that alleges Hegseth gave a verbal order for U.S. forces to “kill everybody” aboard a suspected drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean on Sept. 2.
The first missile strike destroyed the craft, killing most of the crew. But the live drone feed then showed something Hegseth’s reported directive did not account for: two survivors clinging to the wreckage.
According to two individuals with direct knowledge of the operation — who, like five others in the report, spoke on condition of anonymity — the Special Operations commander overseeing the mission ordered a second strike specifically to comply with Hegseth’s instructions. The survivors were killed in the water.
That detail, an alleged second intentional strike, is what jolted Republicans into action.
Late Friday, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi), the GOP chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Sen. Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island), the committee’s top Democrat, announced that they had issued inquiries to the Pentagon and would conduct “vigorous oversight” into the circumstances of the Sept. 2 attack.
The next day, House Armed Services Committee leaders Rep. Mike D. Rogers (R-Alabama) and Rep. Adam Smith (D-Washington) said they were taking bipartisan action to obtain “a full accounting of the operation.”
A Republican-led panel turning its sights on Trump’s defense secretary — and possibly Trump himself — is rare, and the political shockwaves were immediate.
A Threads post that quickly went viral summed it up: “BREAKING: The Republican-led House Armed Services Committee is now investigating Trump and Pete Hegseth for their possible war crimes… This is huge.”
But not everyone is convinced it will amount to anything.
“Having the balls to start an investigation and having the balls to make a hard decision based on that investigation are very different things,” one commenter said.
Another didn’t mince words, “Why does everyone keep saying war crimes? We’re not at war. They’re just murderers.”
The skepticism poured in.
“I’ll believe they’re honestly investigating when Trump is impeached and removed from office,” one user wrote. “Until then, this is just another Republican bait and switch.”
Another fumed, “What’s the point of reporting when they are never held accountable? It’s exhausting.”
The underlying allegations being investigated are severe. The Post report describes a lethal Pentagon campaign that has killed more than 80 alleged traffickers since September, guided by what legal experts say is a nonexistent legal foundation. T
he U.S. is not at war with any drug-smuggling organization in the Caribbean, leaving no statutory basis to treat boat crews as enemy combatants.
Without such a basis, former military lawyer Todd Huntley told the Post, “killing any of the men in the boats amounts to murder.” He added that even in wartime, an order to kill incapacitated survivors “would in essence be an order to show no quarter, which would be a war crime.”
Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Massachusetts), a Marine Corps veteran who received a classified briefing on the strikes, expressed similar alarm: “The idea that wreckage from one small boat in a vast ocean is a hazard to marine traffic is patently absurd, and killing survivors is blatantly illegal… Americans will be prosecuted for this, either as a war crime or outright murder.”
Hegseth has responded with defiance, not remorse.
On X, he dismissed the Post report as “fake news” while simultaneously affirming the mission’s lethal goals: “These highly effective strikes are intended to be lethal, kinetic strikes… Every trafficker we kill is affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization.”
Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell insisted the narrative is “completely false,” but neither he nor Hegseth disputed any specific allegation regarding the second strike.
The controversy has also resurfaced contradictions in Trump’s own posture on drug enforcement. Critics noted that the administration’s claims of cracking down on narcotics ring hollow after Trump pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, who was convicted on cocaine and weapons charges and sentenced to 45 years.
Trump recently defended the pardon, saying Hernández had been “treated very harshly and unfairly,” a statement that online users immediately juxtaposed with Hegseth’s boasts about killing “narco-terrorists.”
Inside the administration, the scandal has renewed internal concerns about Hegseth’s judgment and readiness. Senior officials have long noted his lack of management experience and his history of being steered away from delicate or high-stakes diplomatic work. While Trump is personally fond of him, officials have favored Secretary of the Army Daniel Driscoll for negotiations, including talks with Russia in Geneva.
Publicly, though, the immediate question isn’t about Hegseth’s career.
It’s whether congressional Republicans actually intend to hold anyone accountable.
Great Job ABS Contributor & the Team @ Atlanta Black Star Source link for sharing this story.
