Your Summary of Negotiations: Dec. 3 – Climate Generation

The 2025 UN Climate talks, COP30, finished on Saturday, November 22nd, following talks (unsurprisingly) being pushed into overtime. 

COP30, billed as the COP of truth and implementation, the forest COP, and the Amazon COP, failed to include any language in its final decision committing to a fossil fuel phase-out.

At the heart of COP30’s discord was developed countries’ refusal to step up on finance and their refusal to explicitly recognize the need for a just and fully funded transition away from fossil fuels. They obstructed efforts to fund adaptation, loss and damage, and any explicit naming of a transition away from fossil fuels. It’s a huge disappointment that fossil fuels were not mentioned in the final COP30 text, but unsurprising, since once again, fossil fuel lobbyists outnumbered almost every single country delegation. One in 25 participants represented the fossil fuel industry, a trend that continues from previous COPs.

By the end of COP30, 119 countries, representing 74% of global emissions, had submitted new national commitments in NDCs. But they still fall short, collectively delivering less than 15% of the emissions reductions required by 2035 to hold global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees C. UN analysis finds that even with the latest NDCs and current policies, the world remains on course for 2.3-2.8 degrees C of warming, a dangerous prospect that’s well above the Paris Agreement’s temperature benchmarks. Instead of phasing out fossil fuels, the root cause of climate change, parties agreed to two voluntary initiatives to increase ambition: the Belém Mission to 1.5 and the Global Implementation Accelerator.

Regarding adaptation, negotiators adopted a set of 59 indicators across seven sectors, including water, agriculture, and health, and the adaptation policy planning process, encompassing finance, capacity building, and technology transfer.

Loss and damage, which addresses the most severe impacts of climate change, received relatively little attention compared to previous COPs.

Regarding finance, the talks concluded with a call to at least triple finance for adaptation by 2035, which, despite being an increase, is still far below the amount needed. Ultimately, financial decisions are made in many venues and institutions across the globe, from multilateral development banks to the G20, and are too often grounded in loans and debt creation, rather than grants.

Despite COP30’s location in Belem, the gateway to the Amazon rainforest, negotiators ultimately failed to launch a global roadmap for ending deforestation. Brazil’s Tropical Forests Forever Facility received pledges totalling $6.7 billion, far short of the initial target of $25 billion.

There were some wins at COP30. The adoption of a process to develop a “just transition mechanism” marked the furthest a COP has gone to address workers’ and communities’ rights. The Belém Action Mechanism’s adoption is the result of frontline communities, indigenous peoples, and climate justice advocates tireless advocacy efforts. 

COP30 included an unprecedented effort to center indigenous voices. At least three COP documents explicitly recognize Indigenous rights: the Global Mutirão affirms their land rights and traditional knowledge; the mitigation work program highlights their vital role in sustainable forest management and calls for long-term recognition of their land rights; and the just transition mechanism refers to rights and protections for Indigenous Peoples in voluntary isolation and initial contact.

Also, for the first time, people of African descent appear in decisions and are referenced across multiple strands of negotiating texts.

Photo credit: cop30.br