Home News Page 2658

The Portuguese Election Marks a Shift to the Right

The Portuguese exception is over. In the elections held on May 18, the country experienced a clear shift to the Right: the conservative coalition Democratic Alliance (AD) emerged as the leading force (32 percent of the votes), while the Socialist Party (PS) barely edged out the far-right Chega (“Enough!”) for second place, each with around 23 percent. The radical left suffered a collapse: even added together, the Communist Party and the Left Bloc amounted to just 5 percent of the vote.

In November 2023, then prime minister António Costa, a Socialist, resigned after being accused of corruption. That marked the end of eight years of progressive governments that had made Portugal — alongside Spain — an inspiration for the European left, and the beginning of a period of rare political instability in the small Iberian country. After a year-and-a-half-long judicial inquiry, no proof has been found to sustain the accusations against Costa, which have raised suspicions of a lawfare case.

Since Costa’s resignation, there have been three elections in three years, during which the Left has steadily lost ground and Chega has risen rapidly. The far-right party, founded in 2019, made its national breakthrough in 2022 by winning 7 percent of the vote. Last Sunday’s election marked the culmination of this trend. In the words of Chega’s leader, André Ventura, “Today we can officially and confidently declare to the whole country that bipartisanship is over.” He’s right: the near-tied race between Chega and the Socialists marks a break with the electoral dynamic that has defined Portuguese politics since the restoration of democracy in the 1970s.

Last Sunday’s election was called early after conservative prime minister Luís Montenegro was accused of irregular dealings with a family-owned company and lost a parliamentary vote of confidence. Nevertheless, his conservative coalition has managed to consolidate its position. The accusations of misconduct have not punished the prime minister, but they have amplified Chega’s anti-corruption rhetoric, which the party has used to position itself as the only “clean” alternative to the traditional political establishment. Cases of child prostitution, suitcase theft, and drunk driving among Chega’s representatives have apparently not damaged the credibility of the party’s rhetoric about honesty.

Along with the anti-corruption narrative, the anti-immigration stance constitutes the core of Chega’s message. This has been reinforced by the conservative government itself, which has made xenophobic gestures. In December 2024, Lisbon saw a series of police raids based on racial profiling, widely seen as the government conceding to Chega’s rhetoric, which—without evidence—links immigration with insecurity. Though there were anti-racist protests in response, the raids marked an important step toward the normalization of the far right’s xenophobic discourse. AD’s turn against immigration did not stop Chega’s rise: the conservatives gained just 140,000 votes compared to 2024, while the far-right party added 236,000. Once again, the centrist adoption of far-right narratives has only fueled their growth.

The biggest loser in the Portuguese elections was the Left as a whole. The Socialist Party, led by former minister Pedro Nuno Santos, lost 350,000 votes compared to the 2024 elections, the third-worst performance for the Socialists since democracy was restored in Portugal five decades ago. Santos resigned after the disastrous result was confirmed. The party’s collapse is particularly symbolic given that the Socialist Party —which kept Marxism as its “predominant theoretical inspiration” until the 1980s — played a key role in building Portuguese democracy after the 1974 Carnation Revolution.

The situation is especially concerning for the Socialists because it’s likely that some of their voters defected to Chega, something that already occurred in 2024. Postelection surveys from that year showed a shift of former Socialist voters toward the far right, helping to explain how Chega grew without necessarily taking votes from the conservatives (the other main factor was their success in mobilizing previously abstentionist voters). This contrasts with Spain — another country where the far right emerged later than in the rest of Europe — where far-right Vox draws mainly from former voters of the conservative Popular Party.

Even worse has been the defeat of the far-left parties. The Portuguese Communist Party and the Left Bloc were central actors between 2015 and 2023, providing parliamentary support to Costa’s Socialist governments. Today they are nearly irrelevant in parliament, holding four seats and one seat, respectively. Combined, they received just 5 percent of the vote. Only Livre — ideologically placed between the Socialists and the previously mentioned parties — has slightly improved its result, obtaining 4.2 percent of the vote. But the main takeaway is that the conservative coalition AD now holds more seats than the entire broad left combined.

The geographic breakdown of the vote also bodes poorly for this side of the political spectrum. While the North and Center of the country are AD strongholds, the Socialists are now competing with the far right in the South. Chega outperformed the PS in 121 of the country’s 308 municipalities and won in four of the twenty districts, while the Socialists came first in only one district. This is bad news for the Socialists — and for Portuguese democracy — since local elections are scheduled for September or October, and Chega could turn its votes into institutional power.

Insofar as Portugal is a semi-presidential Republic, it comes to the president, the conservative Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, to appoint the new prime minister. The most likely outcome is another minority government led by Montenegro, as a coalition between the conservatives and the far right would not benefit any of them in the short term. Chega’s Ventura will undoubtedly try to present himself as an outsider to the next local elections, while an agreement with the far right would be risky for prime minister Montenegro, in a country whose democracy was built against António de Oliveira Salazar’s ultraconservative dictatorship.

With the May 18 results, after years of political instability, Portugal has now joined the broader European rightward shift, where elections increasingly become contests between traditional conservatives and the far right, with a weakened social democracy and the radical left out of the game. Spain, where the fragile PSOE–Sumar coalition clings to power without a parliamentary majority, and France, where La France Insoumise remains strong, are the main exceptions to the continent’s conservative turn.

Great Job Pablo Castaño & the Team @ Jacobin Source link for sharing this story.

Adriana Smith and the Legal Horror of Reproductive Servitude in the U.S.

Declared brain-dead in February, Adriana Smith remains on life support in Georgia against her family’s wishes—revealing the chilling consequences of abortion bans that override bodily autonomy, even in death.

Representatives from Emory University, where Adriana Smith worked as a nurse, said they plan to keep Smith breathing (despite being brain-dead) until she is at least 32 weeks pregnant. (Facebook)

Three months ago, 30-year-old Adriana Smith was declared brain-dead. But a hospital in Georgia is keeping her “alive” on life support, against her family’s wishes, because of the state’s strict abortion ban.

Smith, a registered nurse in metro Atlanta, was nine weeks pregnant in early February when she started suffering from intense headaches. Smith initially sought treatment at Northside Hospital but was released that same day after being given medication. According to Adriana Smith’s mother April Newkirk, “They didn’t do any tests. No CT scan. If they had done that or kept her overnight, they would have caught it. It could have been prevented.”

These photos show pregnancy tissue extracted at five to nine weeks of pregnancy, rinsed of blood and menstrual lining. The images show the tissue in a petri dish next to a ruler to indicate its size. Adriana Smith was approximately nine weeks pregnant when she was declared brain-dead in February 2025. (MYA Network)

The next morning, Smith’s boyfriend found her unresponsive and gasping for air. Smith was taken to Emory Decatur, then transferred to Emory University Hospital, where she worked. Doctors found multiple blood clots in her brain and determined Smith to be brain-dead, the legal and medical standard for death in the United States. But because she was pregnant, Georgia’s antiabortion laws have created a legal gray area: Emory staff say they are legally required to keep her breathing until the fetus reaches viability.

Last week, Smith was moved again, this time to Emory Midtown, which doctors told the family is better equipped for obstetric care. 

In what universe does a hospital in Georgia … believe that they can take ownership of Adriana Smith’s body?

Michele Goodwin, “Fifteen Minutes of Feminism: Dead, Pregnant and Imprisoned in Georgia—The Adriana Smith Case“

Abortion is currently illegal in Georgia after six weeks. And even though ending Smith’s life support would not be an abortion, hospital staff say they plan to keep Smith’s dead body on life-support machines until the fetus reaches a gestational age when it can survive outside the womb.

When she died, Adriana Smith was already a mother to one young son. Doctors told Newkirk and her boyfriend that, legally, they aren’t allowed to consider other options while Smith is technically pregnant, even though her family wishes she could be allowed to die in peace.

“She’s been breathing through machines for more than 90 days,” Smith’s mother Newkirk said. “It’s torture for me. I see my daughter breathing, but she’s not there. And her son—I bring him to see her.”

Meanwhile, the fetus is not healthy. Doctors told Smith’s family that the baby has fluid on his brain and might not be able to see, walk or survive once he’s born. “This decision should’ve been left to us. Now we’re left wondering what kind of life he’ll have—and we’re going to be the ones raising him,” said Newkirk. Smith’s family is already facing mounting medical bills as the hospital keeps her body on life support for weeks and weeks.

In an emergency episode of Ms.On the Issues With Michele Goodwin: 15 Minutes of Feminism podcast on Friday, host Michele Goodwin said the state of Georgia is treating Smith’s body as an “incubator,” which brings up 13th Amendment questions.

“One can’t help but think about a throughline from that period of time where Black women were forced into involuntary reproductive servitude for the benefit of other people and not for them,” said Goodwin. “Certainly, Adriana will experience … no benefit from what her body has been put through and what the state hopes to accomplish.”

Goodwin also pointed out the similarities between Smith’s case and that of Marlise Muñoz, who died in 2014, but the state of Texas forcibly kept her on a ventilator because she was pregnant, for weeks while her body decomposed, despite the wishes of her parents and husband.

These cases, Goodwin argued, represent “disparate treatment at the end of life involving a person who happens to be pregnant.” If a man died at one of these hospitals, it’s hard to imagine that the hospital would force his body to stay on life support against his family’s wishes, she mused.

Adriana Smith should be here with her 5-year-old son. Her severe headaches were dismissed and at 9 weeks pregnant she was declared brain dead, the result of blood clots. … Emory hospital says the Georgia abortion ban requires she stay on life support until delivery, though it has been nearly 3 months. Horrifying. Devastating. Unacceptable.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.)

This harrowing case is the latest result of Georgia’s strict abortion ban, which led to the deaths of Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller in 2023. Neither women were allowed a life-saving abortion, despite going through a medical emergency. Many other women, including Josseli Barnica, Porsha Ngumezi and 18-year-old Neveah Crain in Texas, have died as a result of other state’s draconian abortion bans.

Georgia state legislators have defended the hospital’s actions to keep Smith’s body on life support. State Sen. Ed Setzler (R-Ga.)—who sponsored Georgia’s six-week abortion ban in 2019—told PBS, “I think it is completely appropriate that the hospital do what they can to save the life of the child. I think this is an unusual circumstance, but I think it highlights the value of innocent human life. I think the hospital is acting appropriately.”

Other lawmakers and reproductive rights advocates are sounding alarms about the tragic case.

“Adriana’s story is gut-wrenching,” said Rep. Nikema Williams (D-Ga.). “It’s also a painful reminder of the consequences when politicians refuse to trust us to make our own medical decisions.” 

Monica Simpson, executive director of reproductive justice organization SisterSong, said “[Smith’s] family deserves the right to have decision-making power about her medical decisions. Instead, they have endured 90 days of retraumatization, expensive medical costs, and the cruelty of being unable to resolve and move toward healing.” SisterSong is the lead plaintiff in the current lawsuit SisterSong v. State of Georgia challenging Georgia’s six-week abortion ban.

“Black women must be trusted when it comes to our healthcare decisions,” Simpson said in her statement. “After the devastating and preventable deaths of multiple Black women, the message still rings clear: our lives are on the line, and our human right to bodily autonomy has been violated.”

“I think every woman should have the right to make their own decision,” Smith’s mother, April Newkirk, said. “And if not, then their partner or their parents.”


Listen to Ms.’ emergency episode of On the Issues With Michele Goodwin: “Dead, Pregnant and Imprisoned in Georgia—The Adriana Smith Case.”

Great Job Roxanne Szal & the Team @ Ms. Magazine Source link for sharing this story.

How Americans Can Cease Being Rich

Economist Noah Smith delves into the myth of the “hollowed out” middle class, the folly of protectionism, and more. He and Mona differ on Trump’s handling of Covid and . . . American chocolate.

Leave a comment

Watch, listen or leave a comment. Ad-free editions are exclusively available for Bulwark+ members.

Don’t care for video? Use the controls on the left side of the player to toggle to the audio edition.

The Mona Charen Show is a weekly, one-on-one discussion that goes in depth on political and cultural topics. New shows drop Mondays. Find this show wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube. Add the show to your player of choice, here.

Great Job Mona Charen & the Team @ The Bulwark Source link for sharing this story.

Secret Link