Home News Page 125

CAPC’s Most Popular Articles of 2025 – Christ and Pop Culture

CAPC’s Most Popular Articles of 2025 – Christ and Pop Culture

In all, we published 85 articles in 2025 on Christ and Pop Culture. And in keeping with the finest CAPC tradition, we covered an wide array of subject matter, including music streaming services, the Super Bowl Halftime Show, werewolf movies, Rick and Morty, Star Wars, pro wrestling, Stranger Things, and much more.

Needless to say, we’re proud of everything we published, but some articles clearly resonated with our readers more so than others. The following were our most popular articles throughout the year that was 2025.

Many thanks to our paying members for their continued support. If you’re not a member, consider becoming one today to help support our mission.


Great Job CAPC Writers & the Team @ Christ and Pop Culture Source link for sharing this story.

Gen Z revolters angry at government they installed after Nepal’s protests

Gen Z revolters angry at government they installed after Nepal’s protests

Mukesh Awasti was all set leave for Australia to pursue a degree in civil engineering on a sunny day in September, but instead he joined a youth revolt against corruption in Nepal and lost his leg after being shot by security forces.

Lying on a hospital bed at the National Trauma Center in the capital Kathmandu where his leg was amputated, 22-year-old Awasti said he regrets giving up so much for the little that has been achieved after the sacrifices of so many people.

Violent protests in Kathmandu that began Sept. 8 left 76 people dead and more than 2,300 injured before the demonstrations fueled by “Gen Z” activists forced the appointment on Sept. 12 of Nepal’s first female prime minister, Sushila Karki, a retired Supreme Court judge who has promised fresh elections in March.

Since then, the interim government and its leader have come under criticism from many of the people who took part in the protests and expected major changes in the Himalayan nation.

“I am regretting my decision to take part in the protest because they have been zero achievement from the new government we brought which has failed us,” Awasti said. “There should be end to corruption which has not happened and the people who opened fire on the demonstrations should have been arrested but that that has also not happened either.”

So far the government’s anti-graft agency has filed one significant corruption case that does not include key political figures. The politicians accused of corruption by protesters are preparing to contest upcoming elections and there has been no case filed against leaders who were in power when protesters were injured in September.


(Photo by Prabin RANABHAT / AFP via Getty Images)

(Photo by Prabin RANABHAT / AFP via Getty Images)

TOPSHOT – Fire rages through the Singha Durbar, the main administrative building for the Nepal government, in Kathmandu on September 9, 2025, a day after a police crackdown on demonstrations over social media prohibitions and corruption by the government. Nepali youth protesters set fire to parliament on September 9 as the veteran prime minister obeyed furious crowds to quit, a day after one of the deadliest crackdowns in years in which at least 19 people were killed. (Photo by Prabin RANABHAT / AFP via Getty Images)

Demonstrators say promises have not been met

Dozens of demonstrators, including some who were injured in September, recently have protested against the government they brought to power. These protests outside the prime minister’s office has been held in the past few weeks with police forced to break some of them.

“We are back here in the street because the government has failed to live up to their promise. There are so many families of those who lost their lives and many who were injured but what has the government done? Nothing,” said Suman Bohara, who walks with crutches on a shattered right foot. “We are here because we are compelled to.”

Tens of thousands of mostly young demonstrators first gathered in Kathmandu on Sept. 8 to protest widespread corruption, lack of opportunities, employment and poor governance, which was triggered by a ban on social media. They broke through police barricades and attempted to enter parliament, only to be shot by security forces.

A day later, the protests spread across the country. Angry mobs burned down the offices of the prime minister and president, police stations and the homes of top politicians who were forced to flee on army helicopters. The army eventually stepped in to restore control and negotiations ended with Karki’s appointment and the key task of conducting parliamentary elections.

The government has said it is determined to meet that goal.

“As the world is looking forward to a smooth change in government through our elections on March 5, I want to assure that we will deliver these elections,” Karki said. “Our preparations are almost complete, and the security environment has improved a lot with our security apparatus is assured enough.”

Gen Z groups show a lack of clarity

Different demands have emerged from separate groups among the young protesters including direct election of prime ministers, scrapping the present constitution and jailing all previous politicians. There is no single leader or group but rather several individuals who have claimed to represent Nepal’s voice in the Gen Z movement.

The lack of clarity among the protesters since September has been a key hurdle in Nepal, according to analysts.

“All the confusion right now in Nepal is because of the lack of clarity among the Gen Z groups on what they are demanding and how the government was formed,” said Abeeral Thapa, principal of Polygon College of Journalism and Mass Communications in Kathmandu.

Some are beginning to oppose the planned elections in March, saying their protest was not intended only to bring about elections for a new Parliament, while their demands to end corruption and arrest all the corrupt politicians should be fulfilled immediately.

Other groups seek elections that would bring new lawmakers who would perform all these tasks.

It has not been clear how powerful the government is and the limitations on a mandate to fulfill all the demands from the people who brought the interim leaders to office. When appointing the interim government, the president mentioned that the key purpose was to conduct elections for Parliament.

Thapa noted Nepal’s constitution does not have a specific provision for forming an interim government. A line in the document reads, “The main duty of the President shall be to abide and protect the constitution.”

“The protests were not well planned to begin with, they began with controlling corruption and end the ban on social media,” Thapa said. “But in reality what happened was like they had gone deer hunting but ended up killing a tiger, with the protest taking a major turn with the government collapsing.”

It remains doubtful the promised election in March can be held, but there are no alternatives to polls, Thapa said.

Great Job Binaj Gurubacharya | The Associated Press & the Team @ NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth for sharing this story.

We’re Thinking About Addiction Entirely Wrong

We’re Thinking About Addiction Entirely Wrong

Hanna Pickard

Your question assumes that the brain disease model has taken us away from the moral model. In one sense, of course, it has. The moral model treats drug use as morally wrong and judges people, including people with addiction, for using drugs. The brain disease model claims that people with addiction cannot help using drugs because they have a brain disease that compels them to use. To this extent, they shouldn’t be judged, because they have an excuse. But notice the moralism implicit in this line of thought. We only need an excuse when we do something morally wrong. Like the moral model, the brain disease model invites — even if it does not explicitly state — the idea that drug use is morally wrong.

Before we talk about a “psychology first” orientation and what it can offer us, I want to say directly and plainly that I think we must recognize and reject the tendency in all of us to moralize drug use.

There is nothing intrinsically morally wrong with using drugs. Yes, of course there are particular contexts in which it is morally wrong to use drugs. For example, it is wrong to drink and drive. It is wrong to use drugs in ways and at times that compromises your ability to look after your children, whether you are addicted to drugs or not. But there are many, many cases of drug use, both in addiction and apart from it, where absolutely nothing is done that is morally wrong. Remember, caffeine and nicotine are drugs. Alcohol is a drug. Many of the drugs we find on the streets are pharmacologically identical to the drugs used in hospitals and for medical purposes. It is simply a mistake to think that drug use is intrinsically morally wrong, however deep in our history the mistake goes.

I make this point repeatedly in the book. I believe it is imperative to keep it clearly in mind if we are to be in any position to understand what addiction is and how best to address it and treat those people who struggle with it.

With that said, let’s talk about “psychology first.” Psychology is our most basic, powerful tool for understanding ourselves and each other. Humans are self-conscious and self-reflective beings. We understand ourselves to act for reasons, both good and bad. We take our actions to be explained by our thoughts and feelings, beliefs and desires, pleasures and pains, hopes and fears, plans and intentions. In other words, we take our actions to be explained by our psychological states. What I mean by a “psychology first” approach to addiction is that we start by seeing if we can understand why someone might be using drugs in ways that are profoundly counter to their own good by appealing to their psychological states. In other words, we use the psychological tools that are at our disposal, simply in virtue of being human. We imagine what it would be like to be in their shoes, what their inner life might be like. And to do so, we contextualize their inner life in relation to their life circumstances. Psychology and life circumstances are always enmeshed — this is one of the core lessons from the history of rat experiments.

When we take this approach, a very important feature of addiction is revealed: that addiction is heterogeneous. We are used to the idea that behaviors that look similar on the surface have different psychological explanations when we dig deep. This is because people are different. Similarly, what explains addiction is different for different people.

In the book, I document the heterogeneity of addiction that comes into view through a “psychology first” approach. Some people use drugs to get relief from misery and suffering (as if they were alone in a cage with nothing but cocaine), but some people use drugs for the opposite reason, as a form of deliberate self-harm or even to die. Some people’s identity is bound up with their addiction — they don’t know who they would be or how they would live if they quit. But, by contrast, some people are in denial. Some people experience cravings that are hard to resist but also expressive of the emotional depth of their relationship with drugs, while other people with addiction may struggle with self-control, as do we all. But all that said, I by no means rule out that some cases of addiction might be explained by brain disease. Why not, if addiction is heterogenous?

The important point is to stop thinking that addiction is only and always about the brain or the same for everyone. A “psychology first” approach reveals the heterogeneity of addiction and fights moralism by insisting on our shared humanity with people with addiction. This may not guarantee empathy, but it cannot but encourage it.

Great Job Hanna Pickard & the Team @ Jacobin Source link for sharing this story.

Misogynoir à la Française

Misogynoir à la Française

A racist caricature of Rokhaya Diallo exposes France’s enduring hostility toward Black women’s power, intellect and visibility.

Rokhaya Diallo attends the Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga premiere at the Cannes Film Festival on May 15, 2024. (Vittorio Zunino Celotto / Getty Images)

A few days before Christmas, the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo featured an abhorrent caricature of esteemed journalist, author, filmmaker and activist Rokhaya Diallo. The grotesque image (which we will not reproduce here) shows a half-naked Diallo dancing on stage dressed in a banana skirt. Her features were exaggerated in the manner of time-worn racist propaganda—contorting her nose, mouth and eyes for a minstrel-like effect. Next to the image was an audience pointing and jeering underneath a sign that reads, (translated from French) “The Rokhaya Diallo Show: She ridicules the separation of church and state all over the world.”

There is no question Diallo was targeted for her widespread international success and renown as an antiracist activist, as well as her prominence as a Black feminist voice decrying racial injustice, sexism and misogynoir in France and abroad. The timing felt insidious and intentional—the magazine chose to end the year with a harmful message to Black French women, as a holiday send off.

The banana skirt purposefully recalled both the famous figure of African American performer and activist Josephine Baker, as well as the Banania campaigns popular in France during the 1900s. The irony was lost on no one that Baker is also the only Black woman to be inducted into the venerated Pantheon—a fact mainstream France loves to attribute to their supposed colorblindness, which the lived experience of Black and Brown French people routinely and forcefully disproves

Charlie Hebdo has since responded to this controversy directly in a press release, and indirectly by publishing 
a similar caricature of Brigitte Bardot.

But we must be clear: What happened to Rokhaya Diallo was a classic case of misogynoir—the term Moya Bailey coined to describe the unique forms of violence faced by Black women because of their race and gender.

It can also be read through the lens of what Koritha Mitchell has explained as “know-your-place aggression.” To Charlie Hebdo writers and readers, the place for Black women in France is to display their bodies on stage as performers, not as public intellectuals. As Diallo explained with characteristic clarity: “This hideous drawing aims to remind me of my place in the racial and sexist hierarchy.”

By mobilizing the twin tropes of racism and sexism, while also invoking the colonial imagination, the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists drew from a familiar arsenal of racist and sexist tropes.