As YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram continue to dominate mobile viewing, Netflix is rethinking how its app fits into a social-first video landscape. During its fourth-quarter earnings call on Tuesday, the company announced plans to revamp its mobile app and expand its short-form video feature, which it mentions could help promote the new slate of original video podcasts it unveiled last week.
Set to launch later in 2026, Netflix’s redesigned mobile app is intended to “better serve the expansion of our business over the decade to come,” according to co-CEO Greg Peters. The update will act as a foundation for ongoing experimentation, allowing the company to “iterate, test, evolve, and improve” its offering over time.
At the center of the redesign is deeper integration of vertical video feeds, which the streaming giant has been experimenting with since May. The feed displays short clips from Netflix shows and movies in a format familiar to TikTok and Instagram Reels users.
“You can imagine us bringing more clips based on new content types, like video podcasts,” Peters remarked during the earnings call, further signaling that Netflix sees swipeable short-form clips as a powerful tool for capturing attention and increasing time spent in the app.
Netflix is also making a significant push into video podcasts — a sector where YouTube has long been the leader. This week, Netflix debuted its first original video podcasts, including shows hosted by high-profile personalities such as Pete Davidson and Michael Irvin. The company has also partnered with major podcast players to bring established video podcast libraries to the platform, including tie-ups with Spotify and iHeartMedia.
Both of these moves signal a broader effort to make content discovery and daily engagement on Netflix feel more like a social platform experience. At the same time, Netflix has been careful to position its strategy as experimentation rather than imitation. Speaking at the TechCrunch Disrupt 2025 conference, CTO Elizabeth Stone emphasized that the company isn’t trying to become TikTok, but rather to strengthen its entertainment discovery capabilities through mobile-first features.
During the earnings call, co-CEO Ted Sarandos reflected on the wider shift in the streaming industry: services are no longer competing only with one another, but with the entire entertainment industry.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco | October 13-15, 2026
“There’s never been more competition for creators, for consumer attention, for advertising and subscription dollars, the competitive lines around TV consumption are already blurring,” Sarandos said. “TV is not what we grew up on. TV is now just about everything. The Oscars and the NFL are on YouTube…Apple’s competing for Emmys and Oscars, and Instagram is coming next.”
Sarandos also commented on Netflix’s evolving film strategy, referencing the company’s recent shift in its theatrical release strategy as it prepares to acquire Warner Bros. This signals an openness to hybrid distribution models, as the line between cinema, streaming, and social content continues to blur.
In 2025, Netflix delivered $45.2 billion in revenue, with ad revenue rising to over $1.5 billion. Additionally, Netflix crossed the 325 million paid subscriptions milestone in the fourth quarter.
Great Job Lauren Forristal & the Team @ TechCrunch Source link for sharing this story.
Fort Worth Council member Michael Crain was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving by a Texas Department of Public Safety officer during a traffic stop.
The traffic stop took place at 10:20 p.m. on Friday, Jan. 16. There are no details as to where Crain was coming from.
Crain, who is a real estate broker and council member, was booked into the Tarrant County Jail on a Class B misdemeanor charge. His bond was posted hours later at $750.
In a released statement, Crain apologizes to his family and colleagues. “I want to sincerely apologize to my wife and children, the residents of Fort Worth, and my colleagues for the distraction this has caused. I regret the concern and uncertainty it has created for the people I care about and serve,” he said.
Crain was re-elected for his second term in 2025.
Crain serves on multiple boards within the Fort Worth community. Currently, he is Chair of the Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs Committee and a member of the Public Safety and Infrastructure & Growth Committees.
He also serves on the North Central Texas Council of Governments Regional Transportation Committee (RTC) and its Executive Committee, as well as the Trinity Metro Board of Directors.
There are no details of the traffic violation or intoxication tests that were performed.
Great Job Tatum DeHart & the Team @ NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth for sharing this story.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has sparked a fresh wave of online backlash after viewers latched onto a striking detail in a circulating image. The 28-year-old is now taking heat across social platforms, with critics framing the moment as a troubling signal that’s reopening criticism of both her political stance and the persona she presents to the public.
The viral image surfaced on Reddit in mid-January, showing Leavitt seated at an outdoor restaurant table. She stared off into the distance, her lips sternly pressed together, as the bystander snapped the picture.
A viral Vanity Fair photo of Karoline Leavitt triggered online backlash, followed by a quiet Instagram response from the press secretary. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty Images)
Several glasses of beverages, two of which observers believe are alcoholic, are also shown in the image. A man’s hand can also be seen in their snapshot. The original poster claimed Leavitt was “eating tacos at a Mexican restaurant with her creepily older husband in Fairfax County, VA.”
The individual further ranted, “She is part of an administration that is trying to ethnically cleanse our country of immigrants, especially Latino people, but is consuming their culture as she tries to eradicate it… Pure hypocrisy.”
When the image was posted on lG Threads, a user commented, “A Mexican restaurant???? -the people that she is targeting to abolish from the US ? -how ironic!!! Wtf.” The photo’s date is unconfirmed; however, its circulation arrived months into Donald Trump’s controversial immigration crackdown.
Even more jarring than her choice of cuisine is the fact that Leavitt is accused of indulging in a spirited drink despite being pregnant. Trump’s “superstar” announced her second pregnancy in a Dec. 26 Instagram post where she cradled her baby bump in front of a Christmas tree.
She and her husband, Nicholas Riccio, 60, are expecting a daughter in May. The couple is also parents to 1-year-old son Nikko. Leavitt’s presumably growing belly is blocked from view by an oversized sweater, a red cloth napkin placed in her lap, and the table in the lunch outing photo. A community note placed her at three to four months pregnant.
A second person wondered, “Is that a margarita for miss pregnant?” A glass with a black straw, lime wedge, and pale yellow liquid is seen in front of Leavitt, along with a small cup of water. A mugged glass is seen near Riccio with a black straw and lime wedge.
In a final blow, the Reddit poster wrote, “You can see the cheek filler injection mark on her face.” Red splotches appeared on her cheek, chin, and forehead. Her face also looked tight and swollen, and her skin appeared unusually taut compared to her neck.
“That is a fresh face of filler,” declared a third person. A fourth onlooker noted, “Those sure look a lot like marks from injectables!Her face is a diff color from the rest of her body; that’s how my face looks after because they wipe the entire thing down with an alcohol pad.”
A fifth individual quipped, “So Tylenol while pregnant = bad. Upkeep on Mar a Lago face while pregnant = good.” Critics routinely ridicule the White House spokesperson for her unnaturally plumped lips and aged appearance.
In December 2025, weeks before her pregnancy reveal, she was slammed for visible prick marks that lined her lips in a Vanity Fair photo shoot.
Great Job Angelina & the Team @ Atlanta Black Star Source link for sharing this story.
Imagine it is 1996. You log on to your desktop computer (which took several minutes to start up), listening to the rhythmic screech and hiss of the modem connecting you to the World Wide Web. You navigate to a clunky message board—like AOL or Prodigy—to discuss your favorite hobbies, from Beanie Babies to the newest mixtapes.
At the time, a little-known law called Section 230 of the Communications Safety Act had just been passed. The law—then just a 26-word document—created the modern internet. It was intended to protect “good samaritans” who moderate websites from regulation, placing the responsibility for content on individual users rather than the host company.
Today, the law remains largely the same despite evolutionary leaps in internet technology and pushback from critics, now among them Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff.
In a conversation at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday, titled “Where Can New Growth Come From?” Benioff railed against Section 230, saying the law prevents tech giants from being held accountable for the dangers AI and social media pose.
“Things like Section 230 in the United States need to be reshaped because these tech companies will not be held responsible for the damage that they are basically doing to our families,” Benioff said in the panel conversation which also included Axa CEO Thomas Buberl, Alphabet President Ruth Porat, Emirati government official Khaldoon Khalifa Al Mubarak, and Bloomberg journalist Francine Lacqua.
As a growing number of children in the U.S. log onto AI and social media platforms, Benioff said the legislation threatens the safety of kids and families. The billionaire asked, “What’s more important to us, growth or our kids? What’s more important to us, growth or our families? Or, what’s more important, growth or the fundamental values of our society?”
Section 230 as a shield for tech firms
Tech companies have invoked Section 230 as a legal defense when dealing with issues of user harm, including in the 2019 case Force v. Facebook, where the court ruled the platform wasn’t liable for algorithms that connected members of Hamas after the terrorist organization used the platform to encourage murder in Israel. The law could shield tech companies from liability for harm AI platforms pose, including the production of deepfakes and AI-Generated sexual abuse material.
Benioff has been a vocal critic of Section 230 since 2019 and has repeatedly called for the legislation to be abolished.
In recent years, Section 230 has come under increasing public scrutiny as both Democrats and Republicans have grown skeptical of the legislation. In 2019 the Department of Justice under President Donald Trump pursued a broad review of Section 230. In May 2020, President Trump signed an Executive Order limiting tech platforms’ immunity after Twitter added fact-checks to his tweets. And in 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Gonzalez v. Google, though, decided it on other grounds, leaving Section 230 intact.
In an interview with Fortune in December 2025, Dartmouth business school professor Scott Anthony voiced concern over the “guardrails” that were—and weren’t—happening with AI. When cars were first invented, he pointed out, it took time for speed limits and driver’s licenses to follow. Now with AI, “we’ve got the technology, we’re figuring out the norms, but the idea of, ‘Hey, let’s just keep our hands off,’ I think it’s just really bad.”
The decision to exempt platforms from liability, Anthony added, “I just think that it’s not been good for the world. And I think we are, unfortunately, making the mistake again with AI.”
For Benioff, the fight to repeal Section 230 is more than a push to regulate tech companies, but a reallocation of priorities toward safety and away from unfettered growth. “In the era of this incredible growth, we’re drunk on the growth,” Benioff said. “Let’s make sure that we use this moment also to remember that we’re also about values as well.”
Great Job Jake Angelo & the Team @ Fortune | FORTUNE Source link for sharing this story.
NEW YORK – Carlos Beltrán and Andruw Jones, center fielders who excelled at the plate and with their gloves, were elected to baseball’s Hall of Fame on Tuesday.
Beltrán, making his fourth appearance of the ballot, received 358 of 425 votes for 84.2% from the Baseball Writers’ Association of America, 39 above the 319 needed for the 75% threshold.
Jones, in the ninth of 10 possible appearances, was picked on 333 ballots for 78.4%
Jones received just 7.3% in his first appearance in 2018 and didn’t get half the total until receiving 58.1% in 2023. He increased to 61.6% and 66.2%, falling 35 votes short last year.
BBWAA members with 10 or more consecutive years in the organization were eligible to vote.
Chase Utley (59.1%) was the only other candidate to get at least half the vote, improving from 39.8% last year. He was followed by Andy Pettitte at 48.5%, an increase from 27.9% last year, and Félix Hernández at 46.1%, up from 20.6%.
Cole Hamels topped first-time candidates at 23.8%. The other first-time players were all under 5% and will be dropped from future votes.
Steroids-tainted players again were kept from the hall. Alex Rodriguez received 40% in his fifth appearance, up from 7.1%, and Manny Ramirez 38.8% in his 10th and final appearance.
David Wright increased to 14.8% from 8.1%.
There were 11 blank ballots.
A nine-time All-Star, the switch-hitting Beltrán batted .279 with 435 homers and 1,587 RBIs over 20 seasons with Kansas City (1999-2004), Houston (2004, ’17), the Mets (2005-11), San Francisco (2011), St. Louis (2012-13), the New York Yankees (20014-16) and Texas (2016). He had 311 homers hitting left-handed and 124 batting right,
Beltrán was the 1999 AL Rookie of the Year and won three Gold Gloves, also hitting .307 in the postseason with 16 homers and 42 RBIs in 65 games.
Jones batted .254 with 434 homers, 1,289 RBIs and 152 stolen bases in 17 seasons with Atlanta (1996-2007), the Los Angeles Dodgers (2008), Texas (2009), the Chicago White Sox (2010) and the Yankees (2011-12). He finished his career with the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles of Japan’s Pacific League from 2013-14.
His batting average is the second-lowest for a position player voted to the Hall of Fame, just above the .253 of Ray Schalk, a superior defensive catcher, and just below the .256 of Harmon Killebrew, who hit 573 homers.
A five-time All-Star, Jones earned 10 Gold Gloves. He joins Braves teammates Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, John Smoltz and Chipper Jones in the hall along with manager Bobby Cox.
In the 1996 World Series opener at Yankee Stadium, Jones at 19 years, 5 months became the youngest player to homer in a Series game, beating Mickey Mantle’s old mark by 18 months. Going deep against Pettitte in the second inning and Brian Boehringer in the third of a 12-1 rout, Jones became the second player to homer in his first two Series at-bats after Gene Tenace in 1972.
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Great Job Ronald Blum, Associated Press & the Team @ KSAT San Antonio Source link for sharing this story.
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
Donald Trump retains the ability to shock; the day he loses that, he will, like the biblical Samson—another man notable for his coiffure—lose his power entirely. When Trump started his second term as president a year ago, however, I doubted whether there was much more to learn about how his mind works. Even before he’d entered politics, Trump was overexposed. Since then, he has become the most scrutinized person in the world. His tendencies and foibles are well known to voters, politicians, and world leaders.
Yet in breaking one of his most entrenched patterns, he has provided perhaps the biggest surprise of the past year. During his first term, Trump was defined by his tendency to back down in any negotiation or fight: As I put it in a May 2018 article, he almost always folded, agreeing to concessions whether he was negotiating on trade with China or a budget resolution with Senate Democrats. More recently, though, he’s been following through, no matter how aberrant his ideas. The exact reason for this is difficult to pin down, though it likely includes the fact that he has more experience under his belt, fewer prudent voices in his ear, and a lame duck’s liberation from having to worry about reelection. In any case, his new determination is forcing countries around the world to reassess how to deal with him.
Nowhere is this so clear right now as with Trump’s continued pressure to acquire Greenland. In the wee hours of this morning, Trump went on a social-media spree, posting (among other things) an illustration of himself, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and J. D. Vance planting a U.S. flag in Greenland. European leaders seem to slowly be coming to the conclusion that this isn’t just a feint.
When the president began making noise about taking the Danish territory early last year, manyobservers were baffled but not necessarily all that concerned—an impulse reinforced when the matter receded from Trump’s attention in the months that followed. They also had a long track record to draw on. In May 2017, I wrote that “foreign leaders have realized Trump is a pushover.” This held true for adversaries (China) and allies (Taiwan, NATO) alike throughout his first term.
It was especially true for rivals such as Russia and North Korea. Trump talked a fierce game—promising “fire and fury” for Pyongyang, for example—but his counterparts understood that despite his insistence that he was a master dealmaker, all they needed was to get him to a negotiating table. “Faced with a tough decision, the president has consistently blinked, giving in to his opponents,” I wrote in my 2018 article.
This pattern was clear enough that when Trump refused to concede the 2020 election, even his allies were dismissive. “What is the downside for humoring him for this little bit of time?” a senior Republican official told The Washington Post in November 2020. “It’s not like he’s plotting how to prevent Joe Biden from taking power on January 20.” That was exactly what he was doing, however ham-handedly. The effort to subvert the election was also a warning of things to come.
Even so, Trump’s return to office initially suggested more of the same tendency to back down. This past May (why is it always May?), I wrote about Wall Street’s “TACO trade”—short for “Trump Always Chickens Out”—in which stock traders bet against the president following through on tariff threats and then profiting when he folded and markets went up. And they were right, to an extent: Although Trump did impose extensive tariffs, the eventual levels were much lower than initially announced, thanks in part to lobbying by foreign governments. Trump’s resolve remains weak in some areas; he’s swung wildly on Ukraine and Russia, his position shifting depending on whom he last spoke to.
But in other ways, the pattern has started to break. Just ask Nicolás Maduro, who reportedly rejected negotiated exile in Turkey, perhaps wagering that Trump would never actually launch a military strike on Venezuela to capture him. It was a bad bet. Now Trump seems energized and has turned his attention to Greenland. U.S. allies—or people who until recently thought of themselves as allies—are scrambling to figure out how to react. Can they draw things out long enough for Trump to lose interest? Can they appease him somehow? Or do they need, as Eliot Cohen argued in The Atlantic this past weekend, to show a willingness to resist the United States militarily?
Trump is acting emboldened domestically too. He is once again threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Minneapolis, where he seems determined to immiserate the entire city. Before his first term, Trump had threatened to prosecute political rivals, but he was stymied by his aides during his presidency. This time, he’s going throughwith it. In a New Yorker profile this week of Representative LaMonica McIver, a New Jersey Democrat charged with assault for a fracas at an ICE facility, Representative Lateefah Simon, a California Democrat, said, “Typically, we would say, ‘Oh, they’re just trying to scare her.’” But this is much more than fearmongering: “They’re actively litigating this case,” Simon noted. (McIver has pleaded not guilty.)
Signs of new resistance have started to emerge in parallel with Trump’s newfound resolve. Republican members of Congress have begun pushing back—far less than one would expect even in a normal presidency, but more than in Trump’s previous term or in the early days of this one. They were able to force his hand on the Epstein files, though whether they have the courage to hold him to account for slow-walking the files’ release is not yet clear. As my colleague Anne Applebaum wrote yesterday, Congress will need to do much more to halt any Greenland fiasco. Foreign leaders will need to take a harder line too. When Trump was a pushover, it was more understandable, if not wiser, to wonder, What is the downside of humoring him? Now the downsides are clear and dangerous.
Related:
Here are three new stories from The Atlantic:
Today’s News
President Trump’s renewed threats to seize Greenland drew sharp criticism from European and Canadian leaders at the Davos conference. U.S. officials have said that there are no imminent Pentagon plans for military action; Denmark sent more troops to Greenland yesterday, and the island’s prime minister said that a U.S. attack cannot be fully ruled out.
Congress unveiled a bipartisan funding bill to avert a January 30 shutdown; the package omits the ICE restrictions many Democrats demanded and sets up a tense House vote, expected tomorrow, amid backlash over ICE enforcement and a fatal shooting in Minneapolis.
Federal prosecutors subpoenaed at least five Minnesota Democrats, including Governor Tim Walz, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, and Attorney General Keith Ellison, expanding a Justice Department probe as part of an investigation into the alleged obstruction of federal officers during an ICE crackdown in the state.
Trump’s Golden Age of Culture Seems Pretty Sad So Far
By Spencer Kornhaber
Trump’s return to office was widely portrayed as christening a new definition of chic. Young voters and voters of color had swung in his direction, thanks partly to the influence of podcasts, livestreams, and other media formats that now compete with traditional news outlets and cultural institutions. The attendance of tech barons, comedians, and content creators at Trump’s inauguration indicated that the so-called alternative media was now the mainstream—and openly pro-Trump. Its touchstones appeared to be recently booming phenomena including country music, TikTok tradwives, and mixed martial arts.
Trump quickly began consolidating his cultural power by focusing on the old media that hadn’t fallen in line.
D.L. Hughley’s Notes from the GED Section, DL delivers a history lesson that cut straight through modern political rhetoric. Addressing Donald Trump’s recent comments to The New York Times where the former president suggested that the push for civil rights resulted in white people being treated poorly DL dismantled this narrative with sharp wit and historical receipts our community has come to expect.
Trump’s remarks were framed not as a new phenomenon, but as part of a long-standing attitude that has persisted for nearly 70 years. That mindset where white men feel as though something is happening to them is often used to distract from reality. Despite these feelings of victimization, if you look at the actual data regarding income, education, and access to resources, virtually no metric changed negatively for white men during the Civil Rights era. Their standing in society remained secure, yet the feeling of loss persisted simply because equality began to look like oppression to those accustomed to privilege.
The segment then pivoted to the slow, often painful crawl of progress. Integration wasn’t an overnight success story but a battle fought inch by inch. Hughley cited specific examples, pointing out that the University of Alabama only integrated its football team in 1970 after realizing they needed Black talent to win, and Brigham Young University didn’t follow suit until 1978. He painted a vivid picture of the pettiness of Jim Crow, recalling an era where Black people couldn’t even buy vanilla ice cream, a stark reminder that the system was designed to deny Black humanity at every level, from the courthouse to the ice cream counter.
READ MORE DL HUGHLEY STORIES:
One of the most powerful moments of the segment was the breakdown of the term “Civil Rights.” Activists didn’t ask for a “Human Rights Act” or a “Superior Rights Act.” They asked for civil rights. “Civil,” as Hughley explained, is the absolute lowest modicum of human interaction, the bare minimum. It is simply a request for decency. The fact that a request to merely be “civil” caused political parties to shift and violence to erupt highlights the absurdity of the backlash.
The tension felt today, the fraying at the edges of society, exists because there is still resentment over laws that simply asked people to be nice. It’s a sobering reminder that while the laws have changed, the fight for genuine respect and equality is far from over.
Lt. Joel Garcia filmed Anthony Johnson Jr. as he lay handcuffed face-down on the floor of the Tarrant County Jail — and another jailer knelt on Johnson’s back.
The altercation with Johnson in 2024 wasn’t the first time a Tarrant County jailer knelt on someone who was already handcuffed. It wasn’t the first time Garcia watched that happen. And it wasn’t the first time the prisoner later died.
A KERA News investigation found Garcia was there when another jailer knelt on a prisoner named Derick Wynn, in 2019. Wynn was also face-down on the floor, in handcuffs. He became unresponsive, and he died soon after.
Both deaths occurred more than two decades after the U.S. Department of Justice published warnings against the dangers of kneeling on people who are restrained.
Sheriff Bill Waybourn condemned Johnson’s treatment at a press conference a month after his death, where he showed reporters Garcia’s cell phone video.
“Once he’s restrained, the knee should have never went on the back,” he said.
Wynn’s death five years earlier did not get the same level of public scrutiny as Johnson’s. A medical examiner blamed Wynn’s death on mixed drug intoxication. It’s unclear whether the doctor who performed the autopsy took the restraint into consideration.
The sheriff’s office refuses to answer questions about Wynn’s death. Spokesperson Laurie Passman provided a written statement that denied any wrongdoing and claimed “a knee properly placed to control a combative individual” is different than kneeling on someone.
“There is no indication noted by the investigator that the technique was done improperly, nor does the medical examiner rule that as a contributing factor in his death,” Passman said.
The sheriff’s office’s training documents, also obtained by KERA News, say new jailers should not be taught to place a knee on someone’s upper back — for safety reasons.
Derick Wynn, left, and his brother Louis Scott smile for a selfie. Wynn was 35 years old when he died in Tarrant County Jail custody on April 5, 2019. (Courtesy / Louis Scott)
Derick Wynn’s short but troubled jail stay
Through public records requests, KERA News obtained jail security camera footage and more than 100 pages of records about Derick Wynn’s incarceration and death, including written reports from approximately 30 jailers and a death investigation summary from the Texas Rangers.
The records reveal Wynn’s nine hours in jail were punctuated with violence, including altercations with jailers who would later be connected to other in-custody deaths: Garcia and then-Sgt. Sheldon Kelsey, who knelt on his back.
Wynn showed signs of distress and disorientation shortly after his arrest on Apr. 3, 2019. Before being booked into jail, he spent a few hours being observed at John Peter Smith Hospital, after he appeared to be clutching his chest, according to the Texas Rangers investigation report.
Police transferred Wynn to jail custody in the early morning hours of Apr. 4. During a jail mental health screening, Wynn seemed confused about where he was, the report continues. He kept asking for police, “because his daughter had fallen down the stairs.” When told he was in jail, he said, “No I’m not.”
Wynn denied using drugs, according to the investigation records — though the Tarrant County Medical Examiner’s Office would later determine he died of mixed methamphetamine and cocaine intoxication.
Dr. Alon Steinberg is a cardiologist who studies why prone restraint — the law enforcement term for restraining someone face-down — can be deadly. Using meth, cocaine or other drugs heightens the danger because of the added stress it puts on the body, he said. It can make people breathe harder and require more blood circulation.
“Then when you combine that with prone restraint, which decreases both factors, that could be potentially very dangerous,” Steinberg said.
Drugs can also make people struggle more against law enforcement, Steinberg said — making the likelihood of a restraint that much higher.
Wynn resisted jailers all day, they would later report. Around 8:30 a.m., detention officers pepper sprayed him after he grabbed onto a door handle and wouldn’t let go, according to Kelsey’s written statement. One jailer sprained his wrist during the struggle, according to the investigation records.
One jailer pepper-sprayed Wynn in the face, but he kept resisting, Kelsey wrote. So Kelsey pepper-sprayed him in the face, too.
Four months later, Kelsey would pepper spray another man, Robert Miller, who died afterwards, according to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
The county medical examiner’s office blamed Miller’s death on a sickle cell crisis. Experts who spoke to the Star-Telegram refuted the conclusion Miller had sickle cell disease and said Miller likely died after multiple jailers pepper sprayed him at close range.
After that investigation, the county contracted with an outside expert to look at Miller’s autopsy. KERA News discovered the expert never received any materials. The county has never explained why the independent review didn’t happen.
Kelsey did not respond to requests for an interview for this story.
Wynn complained of a burning sensation for hours after his pepper spraying, accusing jailers of pouring gasoline on him, according to their reports. He was escorted to his first court appearance barefoot with his ankles restrained, his hands behind his back and his red jumpsuit drenched, jail security video shows.
Several jailers noted how much he was sweating, including Joel Garcia.
“During arraignment Inmate Wynn was accusing me of setting him on fire while I stood behind him,” Garcia wrote, adding he suspected Wynn was still suffering from the effects of the pepper spray.
After his court appearance, jailers brought Wynn back to his cell and laid him on the ground, with his head facing the cell door. This is a common technique used on people who are struggling against the removal of restraints, one jailer later reported. Garcia said Wynn was kicking and “being combative.”
“I stepped in to assist Sgt. Garcia,” Kelsey wrote. “I placed my left knee in between his shoulder blades.”
Of all the reports, only Garcia and Kelsey himself mention that Kelsey knelt on Wynn. Other jailers say Kelsey helped restrain Wynn’s upper body, or they don’t mention Kelsey at all.
It’s not clear how long Kelsey knelt on Wynn. Footage from a hallway camera shows Kelsey pushing past other jailers to get into the cell and kneeling down, but a jailer in front of the cell door blocks the rest of the altercation. Kelsey left the cell after about 80 seconds.
As they got the restraints off, Garcia noticed blood on the floor, “which appeared to be coming from Inmate Wynn,” he wrote.
After leaving the cell, the jailers realized something was wrong. Wynn made no attempt to get up. He did not respond to his name.
Garcia ordered another officer to open the cell door again. He shook Wynn, who lay in the fetal position breathing but unresponsive. He called a medical emergency, and jailers cuffed him again, “just in case he was to regain consciousness and began to fight,” Garcia wrote.
Security camera footage shows jailers carrying Wynn’s limp body out into a hallway. Wynn lay motionless on the floor as someone who appeared to be medical staff gave him chest compressions. A crowd of jailers gathered around, overflowing out of a nearby doorway.
MedStar first responders arrived and brought Wynn to John Peter Smith Hospital, where he was placed in the ICU in “life-threatening condition,” according to a sergeant on duty at JPS. He would die early the next morning, on April 5.
Jails have to report every in-custody death to the Texas Attorney General’s Office. Wynn’s death report noted he resisted officers but doesn’t mention the struggle in his cell.
“Officers were able to place Wynn in his cell and shut the cell door without a major confrontation,” the report reads.
Wynn’s brother, Louis Scott, shared a series of family photos over text message, which show Wynn was truly loved, he said.
In the photos, Wynn poses with his family and grins for the camera. His obituary memorialized his huge smile and his laugh, which could “light up a room.” He touched everyone’s life he came across, and he was ready to help “just by the mere mention,” it says.
Scott sent photos of Wynn’s grave, too, adorned with flowers. His headstone refers to him as a beloved son and brother.
The dangers of restraint
Kelsey did not respond to requests for an interview. After KERA News contacted him via his county email, sheriff’s office spokesperson Laurie Passman responded telling the reporter to direct all questions to the media relations department.
Garcia’s attorneys also did not respond to emails, phone calls and text messages requesting an interview.
The Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office maintains no one did anything wrong while restraining Wynn. Outside sources who say otherwise don’t have the proper details or context, Passman wrote in a statement.
“The [Tarrant County Medical Examiner’s Office] and the Texas Rangers are highly trained and relied upon to do thorough investigations,” she said. “There is no reason to doubt their conclusion of an investigation.”
In Texas, deaths in custody must be investigated by an outside law enforcement agency — in Wynn’s case, the Texas Rangers. Ranger Ike Upshaw reviewed jailers’ accounts and video footage for his investigation. In his report, he notes a jailer knelt on Wynn, but he does not express concern about it.
Law enforcement experts who spoke to KERA News agreed it is unnecessary and dangerous to kneel on someone who is already handcuffed.
Tarrant County Jail security footage obtained through a public records request shows jailers escorting Derick Wynn to his first court appearance on Apr. 4, 2019. Less than an hour later, he would be unresponsive and on his way to the hospital after an altercation with jailers where one knelt on his back, according to investigation records. (Screenshot / Tarrant County Jail)
“I don’t know why you would need to put weight on someone’s back when you are taking them out of restraints,” said Seth Stoughton, a law professor at the University of South Carolina, a use of force expert and a former police officer.
Gary Raney is the former sheriff of Ada County, Idaho, which includes Boise. He now works with troubled jail systems to improve conditions. He said he couldn’t think of a time when kneeling on someone in order to remove restraints would follow generally accepted policy and training.
“If they’re so violent you have to kneel on them, they probably shouldn’t be removed from restraints,” he said.
It can also be dangerous to leave someone handcuffed, because if they fall, they can’t catch themselves, Raney said. But he emphasized there are alternatives, like getting someone in a device called a restraint chair — though he acknowledged they have their own dangers from misuse.
Wynn died a year before the murder of George Floyd kicked off protests against racism and police brutality around the globe. Floyd, a Black man, died after a white Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck while Floyd said over and over again, “I can’t breathe.”
But law enforcement has known kneeling on someone can be deadly for decades. The U.S. Department of Justice warned about the dangers in a bulletin back in 1995.
“As soon as the subject is handcuffed, get him off his stomach. Turn him on his side or place him in a seated position,” the bulletin advised. “If he continues to struggle, do not sit on his back.”
Still, stories of deaths after police kneel on someone have piled up. George Floyd in Minneapolis. Angelo Quinto in California. Tony Timpa in Dallas.
The Associated Press identified more than 1,000 people who died after police used force that isn’t meant to kill. At least 740 cases involved prone restraint, and in about half of those, officers pinned the person down after they were already handcuffed, “often pressing with knees or hands when the person was controlled.”
Most people won’t die from being restrained prone, but it is dangerous, forensic pathologist Dr. Victor Weedn said. He studies the effects of prone restraint, alongside the cardiologist Steinberg.
Weedn reviewed Wynn’s autopsy for this story. Besides noting abrasions on his back, the autopsy report gives no indication the medical examiner’s office considered the restraint as a possible factor in Wynn’s death, he said.
“It’s not a very remarkable autopsy, but that’s what we’ve seen in these restraint deaths,” Weedn said. “It’s often just superficial injuries indicating the struggle, and that’s about it.”
Medical examiners always need to take altercations with police into account, Weedn said.
“Typically what happens is, the person is alive, they’re in apparent good health — which may not be the best health — but they’re doing their thing, breathing their oxygen, eating their food, talking to people, you know, doing whatever,” he said. “Then there’s a police interaction and they’re dead. It suggests that there’s a cause and relationship here.”
An excerpt from then-Sgt. Sheldon Kelsey’s report about one of his altercations with Derick Wynn on April 4, 2019, where he describes kneeling on Wynn’s back. (Yfat Yossifor / KERA)
Dr. Marc Krouse performed Wynn’s autopsy and determined he died of mixed methamphetamine and cocaine intoxication. When KERA reached out to him for an interview, he responded with an email, saying the drug levels in Wynn’s system “were most notable.” He did not respond to questions about whether he considered the restraint or even knew about it.
The Star-Telegram reported Krouse left the Tarrant County Medical Examiner’s Office in 2021 after he missed a bullet during an autopsy, kicking off an audit that found mistakes in 27 of his cases in 2020. In most instances, the mistakes did not impact the cause of death determination, according to the Star-Telegram.
At the time, Krouse’s attorney said the audit was not independent or impartial. Krouse did not respond to KERA’s request for comment on the audit.
The level of methamphetamine reported in Wynn’s body was not particularly high, according to Weedn, though he acknowledged even a small amount can be deadly.
“I’m absolutely positive, absolutely positive, people have that level of methamphetamine walking around,” he said. “But that doesn’t mean it can’t be toxic.”
Sheriff’s training warns against restraint dangers
Although the sheriff’s office says there is no evidence that Kelsey knelt on Wynn improperly, their own training warns against placing a knee on someone’s upper back.
KERA News submitted a public records request for Tarrant County’s current jailer training curriculum as of 2024. The county then asked the Texas Attorney General’s Office for permission to keep the trainings secret, because people could read them and learn how to “anticipate and exploit weaknesses in the [Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office] staff and jail operations,” county attorneys argued in a letter to the AG.
Stoughton dismissed that argument.
“That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard,” he said.
There are legitimate reasons to withhold some police training information — like descriptions of undercover operations — but not physical techniques a jailer might use, Stoughton said.
“There’s this fantasy, I think, of criminals getting together and poring through the techniques and like, developing counter strategies, and that’s just not realistic,” he said.
The AG’s Office allowed some redactions but ordered the sheriff’s office to release the 477-page jailer lesson plan.
One training module on handcuffing underlines the importance of restraining someone safely.
“Instructor needs to emphasize placing the subject in the recovery position or in a sitting position after being restrained in an attempt to prevent positional asphyxia,” the training says.
The training notes jailers should not be taught to put a knee on someone’s shoulder. They might use a knee on someone’s lower back to get them into restraints, but the person needs to be put on their side or sat up right after.
Kelsey, the jailer who knelt on Wynn, is still employed by the Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office. After KERA News reached out to him to request an interview, the sheriff’s office posted about him in a “Fun Fact Friday” post on Facebook, listing his favorite Christmas movie and go-to snacks. He has been promoted to captain, helping to “keep things running smoothly behind the scenes” at the main downtown jail, according to the post.
Garcia started at the Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office in 1999. The same year Wynn died, in 2019, a national sheriff’s association named Garcia Correctional Officer of the Year.
His career came to an end after the death of Anthony Johnson Jr. As a supervisor, it was Garcia’s responsibility to make sure Johnson was safe after he was cuffed, Sheriff Bill Waybourn said at the press conference following Johnson’s death.
“It’s okay to put a knee in the back until you get them restrained. Then what you do after that is immediately put them in the recovery position. Immediately,” he said. “And that didn’t happen.”
Garcia has been indicted for murder, alongside Rafael Moreno, who knelt on Johnson. Both men are awaiting trial.
Great Job Miranda Suarez | KERA & the Team @ Fort Worth Report for sharing this story.
From the January 19, 2026, edition of Asmongold TV, streamed on YouTube
ZACK HOYT AKA ASMONGOLD (HOST): They are just having roving gangs running around harassing and beating people up because these people look like they might support ICE. Every single one of these people should be locked up and put in a camp. Every single one of them.
There is no place in a civilized Western society for these animals. And the sooner that we realize that and that we’re willing to act on it, the sooner that this can be over. Every single one of them. You got to put them in the box.
…
HOYT: I have what I would do in this situation, what I think the government should do. I think they should just bring in the military, find every single one of the people that did this, build a, you know, temporary camp like Alligator Alcatraz, and then pack them into that camp like sardines, and then basically send every single one of them through federal charges, put them in federal prisons, and then force them into mandatory labor for five to 10 or more years.
That’s what I would do. That would be my solution for this problem. And guess what would happen? All of these problems would disappear. They would. They would totally disappear.
Great Job Media Matters for America & the Team @ Media Matters for America Source link for sharing this story.
Even as exposure to floods, fire and extreme heat increase in the face of climate change, a popular tool for evaluating risk has disappeared from the nation’s leading real estate website.
Zillow removed the feature displaying climate risk data to home buyers in November after the California Regional Multiple Listing Service, which provides a database of real estate listings to real estate agents and brokers in the state, questioned the accuracy of the flood risk models on the site.
Now, a climate policy expert in California is working to put data back in buyers’ hands.
Neil Matouka, who previously managed the development and launch of California’s Fifth Climate Change Assessment, is developing a proof of concept plugin that provides climate data to Californians in place of what Zillow has removed. When a user views a California Zillow listing, the plugin automatically displays data on wildfire and flood risk, sea level rise and extreme heat exposure.
“We don’t need perfect data,” Matouka said. “We need publicly available, consistent information that helps people understand risk.”
The removal of Zillow’s data, which came a little over year after it was first introduced, began when the California Regional Multiple Listing Service questioned the validity of flood modeling completed by First Street, a climate risk modeling company, which provides climate data to Zillow and other realty sites.
“Our goal is simply to ensure homebuyers are not being presented with information that could be misleading or unfair. We have no objection to the display of accurate climate data,” the multiple listing service said in a statement.
In response to pressure from the listing service, Zillow removed all of its climate risk data, including flood, fire, wind, heat and air quality factors. Zillow still hyperlinks to First Street data in its listings, though it is easy to miss.
“Zillow remains committed to providing consumers with information that helps them make informed real estate decisions. We updated our climate risk product experience to adhere to varying MLS requirements and maintain a consistent experience for all consumers,” Zillow said in a statement.
A little over a year after it was introduced, Zillow removed its climate risk feature. Credit: Zillow
Other sites, like Homes.com, Redfin and Realtor.com, continue to show First Street climate data in their realty listings.
First Street defended its methodology. “We take accuracy very seriously, and the data speaks for itself. Our models are built on transparent, peer-reviewed science and are continuously validated against real-world outcomes,” First Street said in a statement.
Both independent academic research and research conducted by Zillow has found that disclosing flood risk can decrease the sale price of a home. “Climate risk data didn’t suddenly become inconvenient. It became harder to ignore in a stressed market,” First Street said.
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Home by home climate risk predictions still remain notoriously difficult. A residence may, for example, fall right on a FEMA flood risk boundary. One home might be designated higher risk than its neighbor, either as an artifact of the mapping process or because of a real, geographic difference, such as one side of the street being higher than the other. Fire risk mapping, similarly, does not take into account home hardening measures, which can have a real impact on a home burning.
In this way, climate risk models today are better suited to characterize the “ broad environment of risk,” said Chris Field, director of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. “ The more detailed you get to be either in space or in time, the less precise your projections are.”
Matouka’s California climate risk plugin is designed for communicating what he said is the “standing potential risks in the area,” not specific property risk.
While climate risk models often differ in their results, achieving increased accuracy moving forward will be dependent on transparency, said Jesse Gourevitch, an economist at the Environmental Defense Fund. California is unique, since so much publicly available, state data is open to the public. Reproducing Matouka’s plugin for other states will likely be more difficult.
Private data companies present a specific challenge. They make money from their models and are reluctant to share their methods. “A lot of these private-sector models tend not to be very transparent and it can be difficult to understand what types of data or methodologies that they’re using,” said Gourevitch.
Matouka’s plugin includes publicly available data from the state of California and federal agencies, whose extensive methods are readily available online. Overall, experts tend to agree on the utility of both private and public data sources for climate risk data, even with needed improvements.
“People who are making decisions that involve risk benefit from exposure to as many credible estimates as possible, and exposure to independent credible estimates adds a lot of extra value,” Field said.
As for Matouka, his plugin is still undergoing beta testing. He said he welcomes feedback as he develops the tool and evaluates its readiness for widespread use. The beta version is available here.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Claire Barber is a fellow at Inside Climate News and masters in journalism student at Stanford University. She is an environmental and outdoor journalist, reporting primarily in the American Southwest and West. Her writing has appeared in The San Francisco Chronicle, Outside, Powder Magazine, Field & Stream, Trails Magazine and more. She loves to get lost in the woods looking for a hot spring, backpacking to secluded campsites and banana slugs.
Great Job By Claire Barber & the Team @ Inside Climate News Source link for sharing this story.