Home News Page 52

DJI’s Action 6 Is Better for Low Light and Avoiding Weird Magenta Skin Tones

DJI’s Action 6 Is Better for Low Light and Avoiding Weird Magenta Skin Tones

It’s worth noting that some of what you’re going to read here won’t be found in other reviews because the 8K 30 fps video capabilities were not added until near the end of 2025, when DJI delivered a firmware update which enabled 8K video. So if you see those initial, rushed reviews going for that Google juice, saying that the Action 5 tops out at 4K—well, they’re wrong now.

The new sensor is a 1/1.1-inch chip and it’s square, which means you can shoot once and crop to various formats, including the evil that is vertical video. One caveat there is that shooting in custom mode for the largest possible use of the sensor and then cropping to 16:9 does not produce as good of footage as shooting in 16:9 mode. I can’t figure out why this would be, but I’ve done multiple tests, and it is. Possibly the same is true for vertical video, but no one cares because all vertical video is crap.

The other, better benefit of the larger sensor is that the stabilization feature doesn’t crop as much so you get a wider field of view with stabilization enabled than you do with the Action 5. This is also true of horizon leveling, which can now be set to either 45 degrees in either direction, or 360 degrees.

Variable Aperture

Probably the most exciting feature in the Action 6 though is not the new sensor, but the variable aperture lens. Yes, DJI put teeny tiny aperture blades in there to allow the lens to shoot at f/2 to f/4. The idea is to improve the low light capability of the camera without sacrificing too much depth of field. So you can use the f/2 to shoot while surfing at sunset and then stop down to f/4 when vlogging back at the hotel, or something like that.

Low light performance is better, as you would expect with a wider aperture lens. The video is cleaner and sharper than either the Action 5 Pro or the Ace Pro 2. And that’s true whether you use SuperNight mode or not. You can really see this shooting D-Log—the ungraded footage is much brighter and sharper. I would say it’s a full stop brighter.

Alas, there is a good bit of noise still and the codec does show its limitations at times. The only way I know around this is to increase the bitrate, which unfortunately isn’t possible in the Action 6 (the only camera I’m aware of that lets you shoot in high bitrates is the GoPro and that requires using the GoPro Labs software). Overall though, for most people, the Osmo Action 6 is going to give you the best low light performance of any action camera currently on the market.

I think it’s also worth noting that there is a potential danger here. DJI has put a mechanical piece inside a camera that often gets put through the ringer—will the aperture end up failing on people two years down the road? DJI has probably done a good bit of testing, but the real world is different than lab tests. I would be particularly worried about high vibration environments like mounted on the handlebars of a bike, which happens to be my main use for an action camera. I know far to many people who have destroyed cameras just from keeping them in a handlebar bag, let alone mounted to the actual bike. Unfortunately, only time will tell.

Great Job Scott Gilbertson & the Team @ WIRED Source link for sharing this story.

‘I’m Going to Get You Fired!’: Texas Judge Caught on Video Screaming at Black Amazon Drivers — Then His Son Allegedly Spits and Calls Them Slurs

‘I’m Going to Get You Fired!’: Texas Judge Caught on Video Screaming at Black Amazon Drivers — Then His Son Allegedly Spits and Calls Them Slurs

Two Black Amazon delivery drivers spoke out about a fiery confrontation with a Texas judge who yelled at them after their vehicles nearly collided, and his son, whom they accused of spitting at them and calling them racial slurs.

LaTierca Thrower and JNae King say they were making a delivery in the Hudson Oaks suburb just outside Fort Worth back in November when they almost got into an accident.

‘I’m Going to Get You Fired!’: Texas Judge Caught on Video Screaming at Black Amazon Drivers — Then His Son Allegedly Spits and Calls Them Slurs
Two Black Amazon delivery drivers said they were involved in a heated road rage confrontation with a Texas judge and his son in Nov. 2025. They say the judge’s son spat on them and called them racial slurs. (Photos: Screenshots/CBS Texas)

They say they almost collided with someone backing out of their driveway, but after the vehicles missed each other, they continued ahead to find the address of their delivery.

What ensued was a road rage confrontation with Parker County Judge Pat Deen, who they discovered was driving the car that had just left the driveway.

“He was just screaming, ‘I’m going to get you fired. I’m going to get you fired. Y’all need to pay attention. Y’all almost caused a wreck,’ and we’re like ‘No, we didn’t cause a wreck, sir, just calm down,’” Thrower told CBS Texas.

White Students In Virginia Sue After Their ‘Prank’ Gift of Fried Chicken with a Side of Racial Slurs To Black Friend Gets Them Suspended

Cellphone video shows the moments of the altercation as Deen lambasts both delivery drivers.

“You stopped right when I was backing out. Are you an idiot?” Judge Pat Deen said in the video obtained by CBS Texas.

His son, Gary Patrick Deen Jr., also intervened, only to escalate the situation. Both women say he started calling them derogatory names, racial slurs, and even making offensive statements regarding their gender.

“You can’t even tell what this b—h is… Look at those sideburns?” Deen Jr. said in the footage.

The confrontation happened on Thrower’s first day on the job as she was shadowing King. She soon left Amazon after the incident. King still works for the company.

“I felt very scared,” Thrower said. “I’m trying to make sure [JNae King] is OK; she’s trying to make sure I’m OK. It was a very unnecessary situation. It was intense.”

The footage also shows the judge’s son spitting at both drivers.

The women said Deen was in their personal space, spitting as he yelled, which they don’t believe was deliberate. However, they say his son’s actions were intentional.

“Most of the confrontation was coming from his son, not him, and from my perspective, as far as the judge, I don’t believe that he spit intentionally. It was more so just being irate,” King said. “You know, I guess his mouth foaming up, so he spit unintentionally, and once we acknowledge that, he spit, the son took that as his reason to go ahead and actually intentionally spit.”

In a police report of the incident, officers wrote they saw Deen Jr. spitting at the women in the footage. His father denied it.

“I never saw any of that. No one spit on anyone,” Judge Deen said.

The judge added that he thought that the delivery drivers might have damaged his car as he was backing out, which is why he confronted them.

He doesn’t believe he or his son did anything wrong, but admits the situation could have been handled differently.

“I take responsibility for some of the arguing back and forth,” Deen said. “I should have just walked away.”

However, both women believe Deen abused his power by threatening to have them fired. They have filed assault charges against his son.

“I feel like consequences are required for your actions, and him — as a judge — he should know that,” King said.

Great Job Yasmeen F. & the Team @ Atlanta Black Star Source link for sharing this story.

AI is becoming baked into health care. Now CEOs are focusing on patient and practitioner outcomes | Fortune

AI is becoming baked into health care. Now CEOs are focusing on patient and practitioner outcomes | Fortune

Good morning. What is the state of U.S. business? It depends on where you are and what you do. I was in San Francisco earlier this week, debating the AI dividend with a dozen CEOs of major hospital systems at a dinner sponsored by Philips. If you’re Suresh Gunasekaran of UCSF Health, which consistently ranks among the world’s best in health outcomes and medical research, AI is becoming baked into a more seamless patient experience. “Being a medical student, a pharmacy student, a nurse is no longer the same in the age of AI,” Gunasekaran said.

For Providence CEO Erik Wexler, who faces staff shortages, rising costs and reduced Medicaid payments in 51 hospitals and 1,000 clinics spread across seven states with different regulatory environments, AI is perhaps less ubiquitous but equally powerful. The reaction to ambient technology that acts on insights gleaned from doctor-patient conversations? “This is life-changing technology,” Wexler told me. “When a physician says that, you feel like you’ve discovered plutonium.”

While many Americans may fear the impact of AI on their jobs, many welcome the prospect of it lowering their average $17,000 tab for health care, which is expected to account for almost 19% of U.S. GDP this year.

Americans’ struggle with affordability and access to health care are two persistent problems U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Suzanne P. Clark cited in her 2026 State of American Business remarks yesterday in an otherwise upbeat speech. She drew comparisons between this 250th anniversary year and the last time America had a big birthday in 1976. Along with fond memories of waving a little flag in the Englewood, Ohio bicentennial parade, she recalled a dour mood shaped by 5.7% inflation, 7.7% unemployment, soaring energy costs, rising crime, stagnating productivity and a “ballooning regulatory state”—not to mention fear of nuclear annihilation amid the Cold War.

Fast forward to today, she said, and there’s been a threefold increase in GDP, a homegrown energy revolution, a 40% rise in median household income and of course several waves of transformative technologies. The lesson for Clark? “Despite all of our challenges, we live in an era of abundance and advancement,” she said. “America is very good at getting better.”

In the AI age, the question for business leaders is how to accelerate adoption and transformation while keeping costs in check. 2026 may be the year where the focus shifts to outcomes. As Jeff DiLullo, chief region leader of Philips North America, advised health systems leaders at our dinner: “AI either has to increase access to care, increase the quality and the outcomes, or reduce staff burden. And if it can’t do those things, don’t do it.”

Contact CEO Daily via Diane Brady at diane.brady@fortune.com

Top news

Questions for the next Fed chair

The DOJ’s criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell has delayed the search for his successor by raising questions about the independence of the next chair and whether they’ll win Senate confirmation. Two Republican Senators have vowed to withhold any vote until the investigation is resolved. One person who will “absolutely, positively” not take the job is JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, an often-rumored candidate. What about running the Treasury? “I would take the call,” he said in a new interview

Ashley St. Clair sues xAI

The conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair, who had a child with Elon Musk, has sued his xAI firm in New York, seeking a restraining order to keep the chatbot Grok from undressing images of her. xAI has not commented on the filing, but has sued St. Clair in Texas for allegedly violating its terms with her lawsuit. 

Trump targets power plants

The Trump administration is reportedly considering a plan to have tech companies bid on building new power plants in an effort to lower electricity prices for average Americans, who are starting to push back against data centers. The president has praised Microsoft for announcing that it will pay higher utility bills for its U.S. data centers. 

Gov. Newsom comes out against billionaire’s tax

California Governor Gavin Newsom has joined a list of business leaders in opposing a billionaire tax for the state that will be voted on in November. He describes it as “bad business,” creating a split in the Democratic Party between him and New York City Mayor Zohran Momdani’s “tax the rich” sentiment.

Oracle struggles to bring employees to new HQ

Oracle is struggling to bring employees to its “world headquarters” in Nashville despite investing over a billion dollars in the office and offering various amenities. Most employees are reportedly hesitant to move simply because of salary ceilings in the state.

Tesla’s self-driving subscription model draws criticism

Tesla customers are speaking out on social media after CEO Elon Musk announced that the company’s self-driving technology will only be available through a monthly subscription after Feb. 14. The technology is currently available for a flat $8,000 fee, or $99 a month. “You will own nothing and be happy,” one X user posted.

The markets

S&P 500 futures were up 0.28% this morning. The last session closed up 0.26%. STOXX Europe 600 was up 0.08% in early trading. The U.K.’s FTSE 100 was up o.02% in early trading. Japan’s Nikkei 225 was down 0.32%. China’s CSI 300 was up o.41%. The South Korea KOSPI was up 0.90%. India’s NIFTY 50 was up 0.11%. Bitcoin was at $95K.

Around the watercooler

Exclusive: Former OpenAI policy chief creates nonprofit institute, calls for independent safety audits of frontier AI models by Jeremy Kahn

‘They’re going to have to think and act a lot more like hotels’: The new rules of office space now that the ‘genie is out of the bottle on hybrid’ by Jake Angelo

Worried about AI taking your job? New Anthropic research shows it’s not that simple by Sharon Goldman

Singapore tries to give its flagging stock market a kickstart with a link to the NASDAQ, allowing firms to easily list in both places by Angelica Ang

CEO Daily is compiled and edited by Joey Abrams, Claire Zillman and Lee Clifford.

Great Job Diane Brady & the Team @ Fortune | FORTUNE Source link for sharing this story.

4 Takeaways From the Dodgers Signing Kyle Tucker for $240 Million

4 Takeaways From the Dodgers Signing Kyle Tucker for 0 Million

All anyone can do is laugh.

Dodgers fans are in a happy mood after outfielder Kyle Tucker, the undisputed jewel of this year’s free-agent class, signed a reported four-year, $240 million deal that includes opt-outs after the second and third seasons. 

Meanwhile, the 29 other MLB fanbases will just have to laugh through the pain of watching yet another star player join the defending World Series champions as they go for a three-peat. 

Here are our takeaways:

1. Dodgers address their two biggest needs with the best options available 

On Dec. 8, manager Dave Roberts said there was “no big splash” the Dodgers needed to make. Later that week, they made one anyway when they signed closer Edwin Diaz. And five weeks later, in an offseason in which they initially seemed content to sit out of the top end of the free-agent market, they’ve also now added the top overall player available in Tucker. 

They are always lurking, ready to pounce, especially if a star becomes available on a shorter-term deal. That was the case this winter, as the reigning champs addressed their two most glaring needs — bullpen and outfield — with the two best free agents at their respective positions.

 They were able to convince Díaz to sign for three years by giving him the highest average annual value ever for a reliever. They got Tucker, who was also projected to sign a much longer deal, for four years with opt-outs by giving him the highest AAV ever for an outfielder (Mets slugger Juan Soto previously held that mark at $51 million) and the second-highest annual salary ever for a player behind only his new teammate Shohei Ohtani. Accounting for deferrals, Tucker’s deal is an annual record in present-day value. 

The cost is staggering for any team, let alone a club that is already penalized at the highest tax rate. But the Dodgers have made abundantly clear that no matter how much money they’ve already spent, there’s always more available in their Ohtani economy. 

The additions of Díaz and Tucker, who both had a qualifying offer attached, will also cost the Dodgers their second, third, fifth and sixth-highest picks in the 2026 draft. But president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman vowed that the Dodgers would do everything they can to put themselves in the best position to win again in 2026. And by adding Díaz and Tucker to a championship roster, they’re in prime position to become the first team to three-peat since the 1998-00 Yankees. – Kavner

2. How do the Mets save their offseason?

(Photo by Alejandra Villa Loarca/Newsday RM via Getty Images)

Mets owner Steve Cohen provoked intense reactions when he posted a cryptic message on social media — “Let me know when you see smoke” — on Thursday night, just a couple of hours before news broke about Tucker’s decision to sign with the Dodgers. Cohen stoked the fire, only for Tucker to sidestep the Mets’ offer.

Speaking of smoke, the Mets have been under fire all winter after president of baseball operations David Stearns broke up the team’s core, with Pete Alonso (Orioles), Brandon Nimmo (Rangers), and Diaz (Dodgers) all departing from New York in the first part of the offseason. Signing Tucker would’ve expunged the anguish of losing three fan favorites. 

How can the Mets save their offseason now? Stearns created a void in the outfield when he dealt Nimmo to Texas. The Mets wanted Tucker to fill that void, hoping their substantial offer would be enough. Now, they can pivot by pushing hard for free-agent outfielder Cody Bellinger, whose versatility in left field and first base is a perfect match for the Mets. 

Beyond position-player upgrades, the Mets still have to bolster their rotation, which was the primary reason they missed the playoffs in their disappointing 83-win season last year. With Ranger Suarez off the board, would signing left-hander Framber Valdez (our top-ranked free agent pitcher) be enough to change the so-far bewildering state of their offseason? For now, limiting Cohen’s social-media usage could be a good start. – Thosar

3. Blue Jays absorb yet another Dodgers gut-punch

Not again.

That has to be the prevailing thought from a jilted Blue Jays fanbase. Two years ago, they lost the Ohtani free agency sweepstakes. Last offseason, they lost the Roki Sasaki battle and then fell in agonizing fashion in Game 7 of the World Series. And now, Toronto has absorbed its latest L.A. gut-punch with Tucker choosing the Dodgers. 

The Blue Jays were among the favorites to land the top free agent, a move that would have unquestionably made them the winners of the offseason and set their outfield up for years to come with George Springer and Daulton Varsho both entering their final year under contract in Toronto. Missing out on Tucker is a tough blow. 

Still, unlike past offseasons, this winter was a success for the Blue Jays even after the miss. After signing Dylan Cease, Kazuma Okamoto, Cody Ponce and Tyler Rogers, they’ve spent more than any team in free agency and have put themselves in strong position to repeat as AL East champions. Tucker would have represented an obvious upgrade, but with Addison Barger, Varsho, Anthony Santander and Nathan Lukes, they can still field an adequate outfield. As currently constructed, they have a team capable of making another deep October run. 

Plus, the winter is not yet done. Perhaps they now turn more of their focus, and the money they would have spent on Tucker, toward bringing back top infielder Bo Bichette. – Kavner

4. A fresh wave of CBA and lockout talk

The Dodgers’ signing of Tucker invites more discourse of a potential lockout at the end of this year. MLB’s current Collective Bargaining Agreement expires on Dec. 1, after which the league is expected to lock out the players and shut down free agency and trades, like it did in 2021.

Once again, MLB owners are pushing for a salary cap, pointing to huge payroll gaps and the fact that the Dodgers are continuously stacking stars and flexing their financial might in unprecedented ways, while arguing that smaller-market teams cannot compete. 

Particularly after the Tucker signing, most fan bases are more likely to side with the owners. The players union is prepared to stand in the way, which could lead to missed games amid a work stoppage in 2027.

For the Dodgers’ part, all they care about is winning. But it’s important to remember, their drive to compete has improved the bottom line. They paid nearly $170 million in luxury taxes in 2025, which shattered the record. This will be their sixth-straight year paying the highest penalty rates. The more the Dodgers pay in luxury taxes, the more money they’re redirecting to other clubs through revenue sharing. 

While a salary cap would, in theory, lead to financial fairness, the Dodgers’ present-day success is years in the making – including their shrewd front-office strategies (deferring player salaries) and strong player development. Those advantages won’t change even if a cap somehow goes through. Still, the Dodgers yet again signing the top free agent in the class will only intensify talks of a lockout and potential nasty labor fight. – Thosar

FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience

Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!

Deesha Thosar is an MLB writer for FOX Sports. She previously covered the Mets as a beat reporter for the New York Daily News. The daughter of Indian immigrants, Deesha grew up on Long Island and now lives in Queens. Follow her on Twitter at @DeeshaThosar.

Rowan Kavner is an MLB writer for FOX Sports. He previously covered the L.A. Dodgers, LA Clippers and Dallas Cowboys. An LSU grad, Rowan was born in California, grew up in Texas, then moved back to the West Coast in 2014. Follow him on Twitter at @RowanKavner.

Great Job & the Team @ FOX Sports Digital Source link for sharing this story.

Trump Administration Orders USDA Employees to Investigate Foreign Researchers They Work With

Trump Administration Orders USDA Employees to Investigate Foreign Researchers They Work With

The Trump administration is directing employees at the U.S. Department of Agriculture to investigate foreign scientists who collaborate with the agency on research papers for evidence of “subversive or criminal activity.”

The new directive, part of a broader effort to increase scrutiny of research done with foreign partners, asks workers in the agency’s research arm to use Google to check the backgrounds of all foreign nationals collaborating with its scientists. The names of flagged scientists are being sent to national security experts at the agency, according to records reviewed by ProPublica.

At a meeting last month, USDA supervisors pushed back against the instructions, with one calling it “dystopic” and others expressing shock and confusion, according to an audio recording reviewed by ProPublica.

The USDA frequently collaborates with scientists based at universities in the U.S. and abroad. Some agency workers told ProPublica they were uncomfortable with the new requirement because they felt it could put those scientists in the crosshairs of the administration. Students and postdocs are particularly vulnerable as many are in the U.S. on temporary visas and green cards, the employees said.

Jennifer Jones, director for the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, called the directive a “throwback to McCarthyism” that could encourage scientists to avoid working with the “best and brightest” researchers from around the world.

“Asking scientists to spy on and report on their fellow co-authors” is a “classic hallmark of authoritarianism,” Jones said. The Union of Concerned Scientists is an organization that advocates for scientific integrity.

Jones, who hadn’t heard of the instructions until contacted by ProPublica, said she had never witnessed policies so extreme during prior administrations or in her former career as an academic scientist.

The new policy applies to pending scientific publications co-authored by employees in the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service, which conducts research on crop yields, invasive species, plant genetics and other agricultural issues.

The USDA instructed employees to stop agency researchers from collaborating on or publishing papers with scientists from “countries of concern,” including China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia and Venezuela.

But the agency is also vetting scientists from nations not considered “countries of concern” before deciding whether USDA researchers can publish papers with them. Employees are including the names of foreign co-authors from nations such as Canada and Germany on lists shared with the department’s Office of Homeland Security, according to records reviewed by ProPublica. That office leads the USDA’s security initiatives and includes a division that works with federal intelligence agencies. The records don’t say what the office plans to do with the lists of names.

Asked about the changes, the USDA sent a statement noting that in his first term, President Donald Trump signed a memorandum designed to strengthen protections of U.S.-funded research across the federal government against foreign government interference. “USDA under the Biden Administration spent four years failing to implement this directive,” the statement said. The agency said Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins last year rolled out “long-needed changes within USDA’s research enterprise, including a prohibition on authoring a publication with a foreign national from a country of concern.”

International research has been essential to the Agricultural Research Service’s work, according to a page of the USDA website last updated in 2024: “From learning how to mitigate diseases before they reach the United States, to testing models and crops in diverse growing conditions, to accessing resources not available in the United States, cooperation with international partners provides solutions to current and future agricultural challenges.”

Still, the U.S. government has long been worried about agricultural researchers acting as spies, sometimes with good reason. In 2016, the Chinese scientist Mo Hailong was sentenced to three years in prison for conspiring to steal patented corn seeds. And in 2022, Xiang Haitao, admitted to stealing a trade secret from Monsanto.

National security questions have also been raised about recent increases in foreign ownership of agricultural land. In 2022, Congress allocated money for a center to educate U.S. researchers about how to safeguard their data in international collaborations.

Since Trump took office last year, foreign researchers have faced increased obstacles. In March, a French researcher traveling to a conference was denied entry to the U.S. after a search of his phone at the airport turned up messages critical of Trump. The National Institutes of Health blocked researchers from China, Russia and other “countries of concern” from accessing various biomedical databases last spring. And in August, the Department of Homeland Security proposed shortening the length of time foreign students could remain in the country.

But the latest USDA instructions represent a significant escalation, casting suspicion on all researchers from outside the U.S. and asking agency staff to vet the foreign nationals they collaborate with. It’s unclear if employees at other federal agencies have been given similar directions.

The new USDA policy was announced internally in November and followed a July memo from Rollins that highlighted the national security risks of working with scientists who are not U.S. citizens.

“Foreign competitors benefit from USDA-funded projects, receiving loans that support overseas businesses, and grants that enable foreign competitors to undermine U.S. economic and strategic interests,” Rollins wrote in the memo. “Preventing this is the responsibility of every USDA employee.” The memo called for the department to “place America First” by taking a number of steps, including scrutinizing and making lists of the agency’s arrangements to work with foreign researchers and prohibiting USDA employees from participating in foreign programs to recruit scientists, “malign or otherwise.”

Rollins, a lawyer who studied agricultural development, co-founded the pro-Trump America First Policy Institute before being tapped to head the agency.

There have long been restrictions on collaborating with researchers from certain countries, such as Iran and China. But these new instructions create blanket bans on working with scientists from “countries of concern.”

In a late November email to staff members of the Agricultural Research Service at one area office, a research leader instructed managers to immediately stop all research with scientists who come from — or collaborate with institutions in — “countries of concern.”

The email also instructed employees to reject papers with foreign authors if they deal with “sensitive subjects” such as “diversity” or “climate change.” National security concerns were listed as another cause for rejection, with USDA research service employees instructed to ask if a foreigner could use the research against American farmers.

In the audio recording of the December meeting, some employees expressed alarm about the instructions to investigate their fellow scientists. The “part of figuring out if they are foreign … by Googling is very dystopic,” said one person at the meeting, which involved leadership from the Agricultural Research Service.

Faced with questions about how to ascertain the citizenship of a co-author, another person at the meeting said researchers should do their best with a Google search, then put the name on the list “and let Homeland Security do their behind the scenes search.”

Rollins’ July memo specifies that, within 60 days of receiving a list of “current arrangements” that involve foreign people or entities, the USDA’s Office of Homeland Security along with its offices of Chief Scientist and General Counsel should decide which arrangements to terminate. The USDA laid off 70 employees from “countries of concern” last summer as a result of the policy change laid out in the memo, NPR reported.

The USDA and Department of Homeland Security declined to answer questions about what happens to the foreign researchers flagged by the staff beyond potentially having their research papers rejected.

The documents also suggested new guidance would be issued on Jan. 1, but the USDA employees ProPublica interviewed said that the vetting work was continuing and that they had not received any written updates. The staff spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to talk publicly.

Scientists are often evaluated based on their output of new scientific research. Delaying or denying publication of pending papers could derail a researcher’s career. Over the past 40 years, the number of international collaborations among scientists has increased across the board, according to Caroline Wagner, an emeritus professor of public policy at the Ohio State University. “The more elite the researcher, the more likely they’re working at the international level,” said Wagner, who has spent more than 25 years researching international collaboration in science and technology.

The changes in how the USDA is approaching collaboration with foreign researchers, she said, “will certainly reduce the novelty, the innovative nature of science and decrease these flows of knowledge that have been extremely productive for science over the last years.”

Great Job Lisa Song & the Team @ ProPublica Source link for sharing this story.

Finer On Film: Zeta Phi Beta On TV & In Hollywood

Finer On Film: Zeta Phi Beta On TV & In Hollywood

Source: Brian Stukes / Getty

On this day in 1920 (Jan. 16), 

was founded on the campus of Howard University. On the pillars of “Scholarship, Service, Sisterhood, and Finer Womanhood,” the ladies of Z-Phi-B carry a rich sense of culture and have a mission to be the best in their respective fields.

We have seen traces of Finer Womanhood in politics, music, public service, and more. In entertainment, Zeta Phi Beta women have shined on TV and in film. These ladies have no problem bringing their grace and style to the medium with every show or movie.

Great Job paige.boyd & the Team @ Black America Web Source link for sharing this story.

THIS WEEKEND: Freeze expected for San Antonio by Sunday morning

THIS WEEKEND: Freeze expected for San Antonio by Sunday morning

FORECAST HIGHLIGHTS

  • TODAY: Nice, but afternoon front will make it windy

  • SATURDAY: Windy and cool, 50s

  • SATURDAY NIGHT: Do freeze preps because…

  • SUNDAY MORNING: Temps 30° to 32° around San Antonio, even colder elsewhere

  • MLK JR. DAY: Pleasant and cool

  • TUESDAY & WEDNESDAY: Rain likely

FORECAST

TODAY

It’ll be a sunny and nice day around San Antonio. Highs will reach the low-70s in the early afternoon.

Then, a cold front will move through making it windy. We’ll see gusts up to 30-35 mph, and temperatures will fall quickly tonight, so grab the jacket if you have Friday night plans.

CHILLY SATURDAY

Clouds, breezy, and chilly conditions Saturday with afternoon temperatures only in the 50s.

With clearing skies Saturday night, San Antonio will likely see its first freeze of the season by sunrise Sunday, so make the proper preparations before bed Saturday night.

FREEZE PREPARATIONS FOR SUNDAY MORNING

In San Antonio city limits, there will be a light freeze by sunrise Sunday. However, outside of San Antonio city limits, it could be below 28°, meaning a hard freeze is possible.

By Sunday morning, a freeze is likely (Copyright 2026 by KSAT – All rights reserved.)

Regardless of if you will see a light or hard freeze, everyone should bring in their pets and cover/bring in any sensitive vegetation. But if you will see a hard freeze, you should cover exposed spigots and pipes just in case.

MONDAY – MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DAY

Monday morning temperatures should start around 40 degrees at sunrise, but rise to near 50 for the beginning of the MLK March at 10 a.m.

Lower 60s are likely by noon, so have a jacket but be prepared to shed a layer. Lastly, it’s looking dry with some sun as our next chance of rain isn’t until Tuesday.

TUESDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY

Rain chances are increasing for San Antoni o Tuesday through Wednesday (Copyright 2026 by KSAT – All rights reserved.)

Exact timing is a little uncertain, but it is starting to look like we could see some rain at Tuesday and Wednesday.

We’ll be keeping you posted on a timeline and potential rainfall amounts!

The latest forecast from Your Weather Authority (Copyright 2026 by KSAT – All rights reserved.)

QUICK WEATHER LINKS

Copyright 2026 by KSAT – All rights reserved.

Great Job Sarah Spivey & the Team @ KSAT San Antonio for sharing this story.

22GW of renewables thwarted or in limbo under Trump ‘blockade’

22GW of renewables thwarted or in limbo under Trump ‘blockade’

The holdups are occurring as the United States teeters on the edge of an electricity crisis. Demand is climbing across the nation, causing household utility bills to soar, and more power plants are needed to satisfy the surge in AI data centers, factories, and electrified cars and buildings. Large-scale solar and onshore wind projects are among the fastest and lowest-cost ways to add power to the grid — faster than Trump’s preferred path of building new gas-fired power plants or restarting shuttered nuclear reactors.

Heinrich, the ranking member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, cited the gigawatts of stalled projects in a Senate floor speech earlier this month. He and other Democratic leaders have said that any efforts to pass bipartisan legislation on energy permitting reform are dead in the water” so long as the Trump administration continues to block development of onshore wind and solar and cancel fully permitted offshore wind farms.

The concern is that we put a balanced legislative package together that gives certainty to both traditional [oil and gas] energy and renewables — but if this administration is going to say yes to all of the fossil projects and create a de facto moratorium on all of the renewable and storage projects, then we haven’t accomplished anything,” Heinrich said by phone.

In recent weeks, a coalition of clean energy organizations sued to overturn the July memo and other actions from Interior and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which issues permits for energy projects near navigable waters. Both the Army Corps and Interior say they’re prioritizing projects that generate the most energy per acre, a measure that favors coal, oil, and gas and undercuts renewables — and which has its roots in fossil-fuel industry misinformation.

Such actions arbitrarily and discriminatorily place wind and solar technologies into a second-class status compared to other energy sources,” the groups said in a statement this week. The Trump administration has choked private developers’ ability to build new and urgently needed energy projects across the nation.”

For solar and storage in particular, nearly 520 proposed projects totaling 117 GW of capacity have yet to receive all the necessary federal, state, and local permits, which puts them at risk of being delayed by the Trump administration, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. The projects represent half of the country’s new planned power capacity.

Many developers are simply receiving radio silence from agencies whose approval or advice they need, said Ben Norris, SEIA’s vice president of regulatory affairs, who likened the agencies’ actions to a blockade on solar permits.” Fung noted one mundane but significant effect of Interior’s memo: Wind and solar developers are now excluded from using an online government planning tool that helps streamline environmental reviews, a move that creates additional costs and complexity for companies.

The delays come as developers are racing to qualify for federal tax credits under the newly shortened timelines. Wind and solar installations must either start construction this summer or be operating by the end of 2027 to access incentives. Time is really of the essence for many of these projects,” Norris said. In the absence of Congress passing a permitting-reform bill, he added, the Trump administration could simply remove many of the roadblocks it created by revoking its memos and other actions.

If they were really serious about affordability and addressing power bills, they could take these steps today,” he said.

{
if ($event.target.classList.contains(‘hs-richtext’)) {
if ($event.target.textContent === ‘+ more options’) {
$event.target.remove();
open = true;
}
}
}”
>

Great Job Maria Gallucci & the Team @ Canary Media Source link for sharing this story.

ICE Won’t Stop Shoving Guns in People’s Faces

ICE Won’t Stop Shoving Guns in People’s Faces

Last Wednesday’s murder of Minneapolis mother Renee Good at the hands of federal deportation agents has shocked the nation. Many have expressed horror and outrage that an officer of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which has almost no legal authority over Americans, would point a gun at and threaten a US citizen, let alone pull the trigger and kill her. Since then, federal agents have continued a spree of violence in the city, last night shooting a man and sending six children to the hospital.

But Good’s murder was not the first incident in which ICE and other deportation agents have aimed firearms at or threatened lethal force against US citizens and other unarmed people. In fact, it is not even the tenth or twentieth.

Jacobin has identified more than two dozen instances over the past year in which ICE agents have drawn or pointed their guns at people, almost all of them US citizens. This count doesn’t include the more than half-dozen shootings of noncitizens that have happened over the past few months, including the fatal September shooting of an undocumented immigrant in Chicago, which experts told the Washington Post was the result of agents serially violating their own training and guidelines to put themselves in danger.

In most of these cases, those threatened by agents with deadly force were following, filming, or otherwise protesting deportation actions. Sometimes, they were just unlucky, ending up in the wrong place or the wrong time. In no case is there evidence that agents’ lives were in the kind of danger that would warrant drawing a gun. In fact, video footage often definitively shows there was none.

It’s an alarming series of incidents, as the machinery of Donald Trump’s turbocharged deportation plans is more and more turned against not only immigrants of all kinds but also US citizens. And it suggests Good may not be the last American to lose their life at its hands.

As we covered yesterday, agents have repeatedly threatened to shoot people numerous times in the days that followed Good’s killing becoming a national firestorm. But we have also seen it happen many, many times before her murder last week, in cities all across the country.

Most recently, there was the December 3 incident in Kenner, Louisiana, where agents repeatedly pointed their guns at a team of roofers, before aiming sniper rifles at them, scaring local residents. Not only were the roofers unarmed and posing no physical threat, but they had work visas, according to their employer and an immigration lawyer who came to the site. ICE ended up detaining only two people.

Or take this November 9 incident, in which a police officer in Orange County intervened when he saw a man in a green shirt and glasses get out of his car and point a gun at a woman at an intersection. It turned out the man was an ICE agent, who was irate the woman had been filming and following him, at which point the officer had to inform him that was perfectly legal to do.

It’s far from the first time in the past year California police have had to respond to a federal agent behaving in an erratic and threatening manner toward someone.

Two days after the Orange County incident, a seventeen-year-old Mexican American US citizen who had just dropped his friend off at home was held at gunpoint by an off-duty ICE agent, Gerardo Rodriguez, who proceeded to interrogate him for twenty minutes and charge him with a crime, even though ICE has no authority to carry out traffic enforcement.

His conduct was so blatantly improper that local police in Southern California arrested and hit him with several charges, including child endangerment. The ICE agent, Rodriguez, who can be seen in security footage inexplicably walking in the middle of the road, falsely accused the teenager of nearly running him over as he held him at gunpoint.

During an ICE raid five months earlier, Pasadena police investigated a masked man who got out of his car and pointed his gun at demonstrators on the sidewalk. When they later ran a search on the man’s license plate, all the information had been blocked, suggesting that he was likely someone working for the federal agents carrying out the raid.

The Pasadena mayor, who lived on the street where the raid happened, expressed anger at the incident, noting that the man could have accidentally fired the gun — not out of the question, given that an ICE agent in Minnesota just a few days ago discharged his gun after he slipped and fell on the ice. That Pasadena incident had happened a day after a different federal agent in the city got out of his car and pointed a gun at a man for trying to photograph his license plate.

Meanwhile, in June last year, federal agents who refused to identify themselves detained a man on church property in Downey, Los Angeles County. When the pastors came out to ask them who they were and what they were doing, agents told them they didn’t have the right to confront them, and one pointed a gun at one of the religious leaders.

Outside of California, there was this instance from North Carolina in July last year, caught on tape, of an agent shoving and pointing his gun at an unarmed US citizen woman who ran out when she saw her partner being arrested, as their son watched from inside the house. A month before that, in June, this video from Memphis shows a federal agent casually pulling out his gun and pointing it at the daughter of the man he’s arresting as she screams that he’s not a criminal.

Maybe most shocking was this October raid on a privately owned horse racetrack in Idaho, in which federal agents from a variety of agencies, including ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detained four-hundred people for hours, many of them parents with young children, who were zip-tied and separated. Multiple US citizens caught up in the raid reported seeing agents pointing guns at people as they stormed the track.

These kinds of incidents were rife during “Operation Midway Blitz,” ICE’s name for its deportation operation in Chicago last year, many of which were documented in US District Court judge Sara Ellis’s November 2025 ruling barring federal agents from use of force against protesters. That 233-page ruling, which used a copious amount of body-camera footage, eyewitness testimony, and news reporting, meticulously detailed a breathtaking variety of abuse by federal agents.

Ellis’s ruling cited more than half a dozen separate instances of federal agents drawing or pointing their guns at protesters or being prepared to use deadly force against them. That count doesn’t include Marimar Martinez, the US citizen who survived being shot five times by a Border Patrol agent last October in Chicago’s Brighton Park. The federal government initially accused her of ramming the agents’ car, but the case fell apart when body-camera footage and texts revealed agents bragging about shooting her and muttering “Do something, bitch” before deciding to shoot her, leading the government to drop it.

One of the instances in Ellis’s ruling came in the aftermath of Martinez’s shooting, when agents at the scene escalated an already tense situation with a variety of aggressive behavior toward the crowd that had gathered, including indiscriminate use of chemical weapons, assaulting protesters, and grabbing a young man, a US citizen, out of a truck. Having inflamed the situation and led the crowd of protesters to balloon, the agents were then directed to “use all means necessary to ensure their safe exit,” including “deadly force.”

Other instances vary in their level of egregiousness:

  • At a standoff with protesters near a school in Evanston, Illinois, at the end of October, an agent who had already been observed pointing his gun at protesters earlier is recorded drawing his gun on a resident and telling him, “Step back or I’m going to shoot you.”
  • A Border Patrol agent pulls up beside a woman recording agents arresting day laborers and aims a gun at her.
  • An agent responds to a military veteran yelling that he had served his country and that agents were doing the opposite by pointing a handgun at him, and saying, “Bang, bang” and “You’re dead, liberal.”
  • A journalist covering protests at the Broadview, Illinois, facility observed agents unholster and draw their firearms several times.

Ellis made clear that these and other instances were often the outcomes of “escalatory force” by federal agents, who one former Border Patrol commissioner quoted in the opinion said were “deploying force that exceeds a legitimate law enforcement purpose.” She also wrote that agents going all the way up to Border Patrol leader Greg Bovino had a habit of serially misrepresenting the facts of every situation that was examined, making it “difficult, if not impossible, to believe almost anything that [they] represent.”

In other words, these and other agents were creating the situations they were using to justify the use of force, reacting to them too aggressively, and then lying about it to cover up that it was their fault.

But even these cases are just a sampling of many more reported instances of agents pulling their guns on Chicago residents. The time an ICE agent pulled a gun on an Illinois state representative alerting locals to federal agents’ presence, for instance. Or the time they pointed guns at bystanders during a raid in Northbrook. Or the time an agent rolled down his window and pointed a handgun at people filming him in Little Village. Or the sniper rifles posted at Broadview as protesters and Democratic politicians gathered.

Or, maybe most shocking, a federal agent filmed pointing his handgun at a pregnant woman in Berwyn, Illinois, in October.

This, too, is part of a pattern, with federal agents around the country repeatedly endangering young children by drawing guns on them.

In Oregon this past November, ICE agents burst into a room without a warrant, breaking open the door and aiming guns at the people inside, which included a mother holding her three-month-old child, in an embarrassing incident that saw the agency wrongfully arrest two men it had to later release. One of the men was shipped around to three different states before being dumped in Mississippi, from which he was forced to find a way home with no cell phone.

Renee Good’s murder was not the first incident in which ICE and other deportation agents have aimed firearms at or threatened lethal force against US citizens and other unarmed people. (Victor J. Blue / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The same month, a similar scenario played out in Queens, when federal agents, looking for a man who had not lived in the house for years, busted into an apartment and pointed guns at a mother, who was holding her two-year-old when they entered. The agents, who did not identify themselves or show a warrant, proceeded to drag the woman by her hair and point an assault rifle at her thirteen-year-old, too, before leaving without making any arrests.

In southern Colorado one month earlier, federal agents followed a young couple driving home with their one-month-old, before pulling them over, smashing one of their windows, and ordering them out of the car, holding them at gunpoint throughout. The driver was eventually deported to Mexico, while his girlfriend and their child are both US citizens.

Then there was the incident in June, when agents detained a family at a Los Angeles court going through the asylum process, including a six-year-old with leukemia. One of the agents lifted his shirt to show the gun he was carrying, causing the boy to urinate on himself in fear. Agents left the boy to sit there for hours without a change of clothing.

Meanwhile, in April last year in Oklahoma City, a family of US citizens that had just moved to town had twenty armed federal agents smash into their rental home and point guns in their face, “traumatizing” the mother and her three daughters “for life,” apparently in search of the house’s previous occupants. The fact that they had the wrong people didn’t stop the agents from effectively robbing the family, seizing their phones, laptops, and life savings in cash, and telling them it would take months for them to get them back.

Last week, as protests in Minnesota erupted, the official Department of Homeland Security X account retweeted a claim that protesters were using their own infant children as human shields, commenting, “Do not bring your baby to a violent riot.” Those are particularly chilling words given not just ICE’s murder of Good earlier that week but agents’ alarming propensity for pointing firearms at infants and young children over the past year.

In a number of instances, agents appear to have pointed firearms or threatened to shoot people out of a tendency to panic on the job.

A viral video from September shows an agent threatening bystanders who were filming his arrest, in a moment of entirely self-manufactured peril. As agents try to handcuff a man in Maryland’s Prince George’s County, one of them reaches for his gun, appears to not know where it is, sees it drop to the ground, then lunges and scrambles to pick it up, immediately pointing it at bystanders and keeping it aimed even once he’s able to get up on his knees. His partner likewise draws his own firearm.

A month later, in nearby Portland, a federal agent threatened to shoot an ambulance driver trying to take an injured protester from an ICE facility to a hospital. According to reports written by the ambulance crew immediately after the incident, and backed up by audio recordings and dispatch reports obtained by the local Willamette Week, the incident happened because federal agents blocked the path of the ambulance for ten minutes by standing in front of it. One of the agents responsible was apparently frightened when the driver put the ambulance into park, causing the vehicle to roll forward slightly.

In several cases, federal agents have shot at US citizens and claimed, as they did with Good’s murder, that they feared being run over.

In late October, agents shot a food bank worker, Carlos Jimenez, in Ontario, California, after he asked them to move away from a bus stop where school kids would soon be gathering. His lawyer says that an agent immediately drew a gun and pointed it at his face, ordering him to leave, but that when he reversed his car to avoid hitting the federal vehicle in front of him, an agent shot him through the back window, confirmed by photos of the gunshot. ICE claimed that Jimenez reversed his car toward ICE agents, and that “an ICE officer, fearing for his life, fired defensive shots at the vehicle.” They later arrested him at the hospital, preventing him from getting medical treatment.

The case mirrored an incident two months earlier in San Bernardino, when CBP agents who shot at two US citizens, one of them eighteen years old, likewise claimed that they had fired in self-defense because the car they were in had hit two of their agents. But in that case, two separate videos existed of the incident, revealing that the agents were lying. A video taken inside the car shows masked agents immediately approaching the car with their guns drawn, refusing to identify themselves, then smashing the windows and reaching inside the car, prompting the driver to flee and the agents to shoot the car three times. Neither that footage nor a video from  outside the truck show agents being hit by the car.

The incident suggests that in at least some cases, agents actively feign cowardice in order to justify trying to kill people.

Looking over these cases, the most surprising thing about Good’s death is that something like it had not happened earlier.

Her murder appears to have been the deadly culmination of what has, over the past year, become alarmingly common behavior from ICE and other federal agents, who have displayed — repeatedly, over months, and all over the country — a volatile combination of characteristics: being highly aggressive, at times incompetent, and prone to panicking, often in situations created by their decision to escalate or ignore their own best practices.

The fact that this has often been aimed at citizens in seeming retaliation for protesting or objecting to their operations is especially disturbing. As the Department of Homeland Security and the federal government now explicitly treat activists and other opponents as criminals and targets of investigation and prosecution — and as Trump officials explicitly vow to grant agents total immunity over anything they do on American streets — it is only a matter of time before federal agents kill another US citizen exercising her First Amendment rights.

Great Job Branko Marcetic & the Team @ Jacobin Source link for sharing this story.

Houston ISD parents praise schools but question district’s direction, new survey shows | Houston Public Media

Houston ISD parents praise schools but question district’s direction, new survey shows | Houston Public Media

Colleen DeGuzman/Houston Public Media

Houston ISD’s Hattie Mae White Educational Support Center.

Houston ISD is reporting overwhelming favorability among parents in the district from its winter family sentiment survey, but respondents reported lower levels of confidence when asked if the district is improving or headed in the right direction.

More than 11,000 parents and guardians responded to the winter family sentiment survey conducted over a two-week period in December gauging their perception of the school district, which has been under the control of the Texas Education Agency since 2023 because of repeatedly poor academic performance by one high school.

“We’re excited that more than 90% of those families had overall positive sentiment as they thought about their experience within their campus in the district and that 84% of those families would recommend their schools to others,” said Matthew Sawyer, HISD’s deputy chief of data and impact.

Parents were asked 12 questions in the survey covering six topics including: academic challenge and quality, safety and belonging, school progress and readiness, district perception communication, special education support and communication.

The survey reports high favorability when parents were asked about their child’s academic needs being met, school safety and school communications. Black families reported the lowest level of favorability among the different racial groups when it came to their child feeling physically safe, welcome and included at school.

District preparedness earned the lowest performance rating of all the categories as 67% of parents said they believe HISD is improving or that the district is headed in the right direction. This topic also produced the largest discrepancy between schools that are part of the New Education System (NES) and those that are not. Seventy-seven percent of parents at NES campuses – which are under an instructional reform model implemented by state-appointed Superintendent Mike Miles – agreed the district is improving and moving in the right direction, while 62% of parents at non-NES campuses agreed.

RELATED: Houston ISD schools with controversial instructional reforms show steeper enrollment drops than other campuses

Houston ISD spokesperson Lana Hill wrote in a statement to Houston Public Media, “During a period of significant change, it’s not unusual for overall perception to lag behind individual experiences. As families continue to see dramatic improvements and significant academic growth over time, our hope is that overall perception will continue to rise. Our focus remains on listening closely to families, strengthening instruction in every classroom, and sustaining the improvements that are already driving measurable progress. The trust reflected at the campus level is the foundation, and we’re committed to earning that same confidence districtwide.”

District perception also varied substantially between Hispanic families, which reported 76.8% favorability, and white families, which reported 37.9% favorability.

The next two lowest rated categories were school progress and readiness as well as special education support and communication. Both received 82% favorability.

The survey, which is the second since the start of the state takeover, went out to more than 40,000 parents. The district said it chose to not send the survey to every parent in the district and instead to employ “stratified random sampling.”

“We don’t send it to everybody, because while it feels more inclusive to send the survey to everyone, what we know is that response rates among different groups are very different, and so best practices nationally indicate random sampling like this helps ensure that you end up with a representative sample at the end of the day,” Sawyer said.

The district says the survey response rate nearly doubled since the last survey taken in May of last year.

“These results reflect the hard work of our educators, staff, and school leaders who are committed to student success every single day,” Miles in a news release. “Families are seeing real improvement in their schools and across HISD. We’re grateful for their confidence and will continue working to earn their trust.”

Great Job & the Team @ Houston Public Media for sharing this story.

Secret Link